Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39092578›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2025

Prolonged second stage of labor and risk of postpartum hemorrhage in nullipara with epidural anesthesia and vaginal delivery: A cohort study with propensity score analysis.

Shuang Liang, Wenguang Zheng, Ying Zhao, Baotong Su, Hongyan Cui, Yan Lv, Yanjiu Jia, Xu Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Prolonged second stage of labor and risk of postpartum hemorrhage in nullipara with epidural anesthesia and vaginal delivery: A cohort study with propensity score analysis.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Shuang LiangTianjin Central Hospital of Gynecology Obstetrics/Nankai University Affiliated Maternity Hospital, Tianjin, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9059-9130
Wenguang ZhengSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Tianjin University of Technology, Tianjin, China.
Ying ZhaoSchool of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, China.
Baotong SuSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Tianjin University of Technology, Tianjin, China.
Hongyan CuiTianjin Central Hospital of Gynecology Obstetrics/Nankai University Affiliated Maternity Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Yan LvTianjin Key Laboratory of Human Development and Reproductive Regulation, Tianjin, China.
Yanjiu JiaTianjin Central Hospital of Gynecology Obstetrics/Nankai University Affiliated Maternity Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Xu ChenTianjin Central Hospital of Gynecology Obstetrics/Nankai University Affiliated Maternity Hospital, Tianjin, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-1279-9857

Funding

National Clinical Key Specialty and Key Disease Queue Project GJZDZKZBDL2022-03National Key Research and Development Program of China 2021YFC2701500The Open Fund of Tianjin Central Hospital of Gynecology Obstetrics/Tianjin Key Laboratory of human development and reproductive regulation 2022XHY01Tianjin Key Medical Discipline(Specialty) Construction Project TJYXZDXK-043ATianjin Municipal Education Commission Research Project 2023YXYZ07Tianjin Municipal Science and Technology Program 21JCZDJC00080
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo conduct an analysis using propensity score methods, exploring the association between a prolonged second stage (>3 h) and the risk of postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) in a diverse population.

methodsWe conducted a prospective cohort study involving nullipara with epidural anesthesia and vaginal delivery, aged ≥18 years, presenting cephalically, and with a gestational age (GA) of ≥24 weeks at a tertiary maternity hospital in China (chictr.org.cn identifier: ChiCTR2200063094). Women undergoing emergency cesarean section in labor were excluded. The primary outcome was PPH, with secondary outcomes including severe postpartum hemorrhage and blood transfusion. We employed propensity score overlap weighting to analyze the association between prolonged second stage labor and PPH.

resultsThe study included 3643 nullipara with epidural anesthesia, comprising 77 with a second stage of labor >3 h and 3566 with a second stage ≤3 h. Utilizing propensity score overlap weighting, there were no significant differences observed between the two groups regarding the risk of PPH (29.87% in >3 h group vs 17.64% in ≤3 h group; weighted odds ratio 1.01; 95% CI: 0.51-2.02). Subgroup interaction tests for PPH were not significant for assisted vaginal delivery, induction of labor, macrosomia, third-/fourth-degree perineal laceration, GA >41 weeks, twin pregnancies, episiotomy and GA >37 weeks. Sensitivity analysis did not reveal significant differences.

conclusionThis study did not find evidence supporting an increased risk of PPH associated with a second stage of labor lasting >3 h in our population, providing additional evidence for clinical practice.

Indexed as

Anesthesia, EpiduralDelivery, ObstetricLabor Stage, SecondPostpartum HemorrhagePropensity ScoreAdultAnesthesia, ObstetricalChinaFemaleHumansParityPregnancyProspective StudiesRisk FactorsTime FactorsYoung Adultlaboroverlap weightingpostpartum hemorrhageprolonged second stagesecond stage of labor

Identifiers

PMID39092578
PMCPMC11649855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.