Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39092546›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2025

The value of routine hemoglobin level evaluation following elective cesarean section: Is it worthwhile?

Wisam Assaf, Maya Gruber, Eiman Shalabna, Chen Nahshon, Reuven Kedar, Ofer Lavie, Yakir Segev, Lena Sagi-Dain

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The value of routine hemoglobin level evaluation following elective cesarean section: Is it worthwhile?International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Article
  5. Eliminating Routine Maternal Blood Work After Cesarean Birth: A Quality Improvement Project.Journal for healthcare quality : official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Wisam AssafDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lady Davis Carmel Medical Center, Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion University, Haifa, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2866-9457
Maya GruberDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lady Davis Carmel Medical Center, Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion University, Haifa, Israel.
Eiman ShalabnaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lady Davis Carmel Medical Center, Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion University, Haifa, Israel.
Chen NahshonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lady Davis Carmel Medical Center, Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion University, Haifa, Israel.
Reuven KedarDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lady Davis Carmel Medical Center, Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion University, Haifa, Israel.
Ofer LavieDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lady Davis Carmel Medical Center, Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion University, Haifa, Israel.
Yakir SegevDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lady Davis Carmel Medical Center, Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion University, Haifa, Israel.
Lena Sagi-DainDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lady Davis Carmel Medical Center, Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion University, Haifa, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to assess the usefulness of routine hemoglobin testing following elective and urgent cesarean section (CS) in patients without primary postpartum hemorrhage (PPH).

methodsThis retrospective cohort study included women who underwent vaginal delivery (VD), elective CS, and urgent CS at Carmel Medical Center from 2015 to 2020. Data were extracted from the obstetric database, excluding deliveries with PPH. Demographic and obstetric variables were recorded. Primary outcomes were the need for packed red blood cell transfusion.

resultsA total of 19 446 women were included, with five (0.3%) requiring a blood transfusion in the elective CS group, 27 (0.17%) in the VD group, and eight (0.4%) in the urgent CS group. Urgent CS was associated with a higher risk of blood transfusion, but there was no significant difference between elective CS and VD. Elective CS showed the lowest rates of post-delivery hemoglobin below 7 g/dL 1 (0.1%) compared to VD 16 (0.6%) and urgent CS 13 (0.7%).

conclusionRoutine postoperative hemoglobin testing following elective CS in asymptomatic patients without PPH appears unnecessary. This study supports reconsidering routine hemoglobin testing following elective CS, aligning with the goal of optimizing resource utilization while maintaining patient quality.

Indexed as

Cesarean SectionElective Surgical ProceduresHemoglobinsAdultFemaleHumansPostpartum HemorrhagePregnancyRetrospective StudiesHemoglobinsblood transfusioncomplete blood countcost savingelective cesarean sectionurgent cesarean sectionvaginal delivery

Identifiers

PMID39092546
PMCPMC11649864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.