Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39092475›Full record

SynthesisBiological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society2025

Hybridization in the Anthropocene - how pollution and climate change disrupt mate selection in freshwater fish.

Wilson F Ramirez-Duarte, Benjamin M Moran, Daniel L Powell, Claudia Bank, Vitor C Sousa, Gil G Rosenthal, Molly Schumer, Chelsea M Rochman

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Genetics and genomics of hybridization.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Wilson F Ramirez-DuarteDepartment of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, 25 Willcocks Street, Room 3055, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 3B2, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9943-9106
Benjamin M MoranDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, 327 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Daniel L PowellDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, 327 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Claudia BankInstitute of Ecology and Evolution, Universität Bern, Baltzerstrasse 6, Bern, 3012, Switzerland.
Vitor C SousaCentre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes, University of Lisbon, Campo Grande 016, Lisbon, 1749-016, Portugal.
Gil G RosenthalDepartment of Biology, Università degli Studi di Padova, Padova, 35131, Italy.
Molly SchumerDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, 327 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Chelsea M RochmanDepartment of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, 25 Willcocks Street, Room 3055, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 3B2, Canada.

Funding

Human Frontier Science Program RGY0081/2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemical pollutants and/or climate change have the potential to break down reproductive barriers between species and facilitate hybridization. Hybrid zones may arise in response to environmental gradients and secondary contact between formerly allopatric populations, or due to the introduction of non-native species. In freshwater ecosystems, field observations indicate that changes in water quality and chemistry, due to pollution and climate change, are correlated with an increased frequency of hybridization. Physical and chemical disturbances of water quality can alter the sensory environment, thereby affecting chemical and visual communication among fish. Moreover, multiple chemical compounds (e.g. pharmaceuticals, metals, pesticides, and industrial contaminants) may impair fish physiology, potentially affecting phenotypic traits relevant for mate selection (e.g. pheromone production, courtship, and coloration). Although warming waters have led to documented range shifts, and chemical pollution is ubiquitous in freshwater ecosystems, few studies have tested hypotheses about how these stressors may facilitate hybridization and what this means for biodiversity and species conservation. Through a systematic literature review across disciplines (i.e. ecotoxicology and evolutionary biology), we evaluate the biological interactions, toxic mechanisms, and roles of physical and chemical environmental stressors (i.e. chemical pollution and climate change) in disrupting mate preferences and inducing interspecific hybridization in freshwater fish. Our study indicates that climate change-driven changes in water quality and chemical pollution may impact visual and chemical communication crucial for mate choice and thus could facilitate hybridization among fishes in freshwater ecosystems. To inform future studies and conservation management, we emphasize the importance of further research to identify the chemical and physical stressors affecting mate choice, understand the mechanisms behind these interactions, determine the concentrations at which they occur, and assess their impact on individuals, populations, species, and biological diversity in the Anthropocene.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeFishesFresh WaterHybridization, GeneticAnimalsMating Preference, AnimalWater Pollutants, ChemicalWater Pollutants, Chemicalcontaminantsenvironmental stressorshybridsmate choicereproductive barriersspeciationwater quality

Identifiers

PMID39092475
PMCPMC11718598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.