Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39092416›Full record

ArticleJournal of physical therapy science2024

Effect of electrode attachment location for transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for pain relief in lumbar vertebral body fractures.

Kanshu Hara, Hideki Yoshida, Dai Tanaka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of physical therapy science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kanshu HaraDepartment of Rehabilitation, Kuroishi General Hospital: 1-70 Kitami, Kuroishi, Aomori 036-0541, Japan.
Hideki YoshidaDepartment of Comprehensive Rehabilitation Science, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Health Sciences, Japan.
Dai TanakaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Kuroishi General Hospital, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

[Purpose] This study aimed to investigate the effect of the location of electrode attachment in transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on pain relief in patients with lumbar vertebral body fractures. [Participants and Methods] This study included 59 patients with lumbar vertebral body fractures, who were randomly assigned to receive transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation to the lumbar region, lower limbs, or upper limbs, or no treatment, over a 4-week period. Pain, activities of daily living, and pain catastrophizing were assessed. [Results] Compared with the control group, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation to the lumbar region or lower limbs significantly reduced pain levels in the first 2 weeks. Although, activities of daily living and pain catastrophizing improved over time, no significant differences were observed between the groups. [Conclusion] Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation provides pain relief to patients during the early stages of lumbar vertebral body fractures. However, it had no effect on the activities of daily living, pain catastrophizing, or long-term pain-relief. For lumbar vertebral body fracture pain relief, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation electrodes should be attached to the lumbar region or lower limbs.

Indexed as

Lumbar vertebral body fracturePain reliefTranscutaneous electrical nerve stimulation

Identifiers

PMID39092416
PMCPMC11290860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.