Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39092389›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

The Management of Esophageal Perforation: A Systematic Review.

Tariq M Shaqran, Rawan Engineer, Esra M Abdalla, Abdulrahman A Alamoudi, Reham Almahdi, Ahmed Aldhahri, Afyaa M Alghamdi, Bashair M Abufarea, Ruyuf F Almutairi, Ali A Al-Suliman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. [Esophageal perforation: surgical outcomes in a referral center].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Endoscopic stent placement for perforation after pneumatic dilation in achalasia.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Tariq M ShaqranFamily Medicine, King Salman Armed Forces Hospital, Tabuk, SAU.
Rawan EngineerSurgery, Salmaniya Medical Complex, Manama, BHR.
Esra M AbdallaFamily Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, USA.
Abdulrahman A AlamoudiCollege of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, SAU.
Reham AlmahdiCollege of Medicine, Al Baha University, Al Baha, SAU.
Ahmed AldhahriMedicine and Surgery, Ibn Sina National College for Medical Studies, Jeddah, SAU.
Afyaa M AlghamdiMedicine and Surgery, Al Baha University, Al Baha, SAU.
Bashair M AbufareaMedicine and Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, SAU.
Ruyuf F AlmutairiCollege of Medicine, University of Tabuk, Tabuk, SAU.
Ali A Al-SulimanCollege of Medicine, Vision Colleges, Riyadh, SAU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Esophageal perforation, a rare and serious condition, has seen a reduction in mortality from 30% to 15% over the last three decades due to advancements such as gastrointestinal stents, minimally invasive surgeries, and improved interventional radiology techniques. This review analyzes management strategies for esophageal perforation based on 14 English-language articles published from 2009 to 2024, primarily utilizing surveys and national database analyses. The management of esophageal perforation is complex, with challenges in diagnosis and treatment strategy. Despite surgery being the traditional treatment, the role of less invasive methods is growing. Effective management of esophageal perforation involves advanced imaging for diagnosis, hemodynamic stabilization, and a multidisciplinary approach to treatment, including surgical and non-surgical interventions. The evidence for different treatment outcomes remains limited, highlighting the need for comprehensive care involving thoracic surgery, interventional radiology, gastroenterology, and critical care in an intensive care unit setting.

Indexed as

boerhaave syndromeesophagealmanagementperforationrupture

Identifiers

PMID39092389
PMCPMC11293018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.