Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39092366›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Anti-carbamylated Protein Antibodies Positivity in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Its Association With Rheumatoid Factor and Anti-cyclic Citrullinated Protein Antibodies.

Dhanush Balaji, Kavitha Mohanasundaram, Karpaka Vinayakam Gopalakrishnan, Prasanna Karthik Suthakaran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dhanush BalajiInternal Medicine, Saveetha Medical College Hospital, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, IND.
Kavitha MohanasundaramRheumatology, Saveetha Medical College Hospital, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, IND.
Karpaka Vinayakam GopalakrishnanInternal Medicine, Saveetha Medical College Hospital, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, IND.
Prasanna Karthik SuthakaranInternal Medicine, Saveetha Medical College Hospital, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a widespread autoimmune disease affecting millions of people worldwide. The current markers include anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) antibodies and rheumatoid factor (RF), which are nonspecific and elevated in various conditions and do not have a prognostic value. They are also elevated in the later stages of the disease. Anti-carbamylated protein (anti-CarP) antibodies have been reported to be associated with joint damage in RA. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of anti-CarP antibodies in individuals with RA and their relationship with inflammatory markers such as C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). Methods This was a cross-sectional case-control study conducted from April 2020 to March 2021 at the Saveetha Medical College, Chennai, India. The age makeup of the three groups was evaluated: Group 1 comprised anti-CCP and RF-positive patients; Group 2 comprised anti-CCP and RF-negative patients; and Group 3 was the control group, which comprised healthy volunteers. Patient samples, including blood and serum, have been utilized to conduct various assessments aimed at evaluating biomarkers such as CRP, ESR, RF, and autoantibodies like anti-CCP and anti-CarP. Results This study examined the role of various autoantibodies and biomarkers in RA across three distinct groups. Group 1 predominantly consisted of middle-aged individuals, and women constituted the majority in both Group 1 and Group 2, consistent with higher RA prevalence among females. In Group 1, 65.7% of patients tested positive for anti-CarP, while in Group 2, 48.6% tested positive even when RF and anti-CCP antibodies were absent. This suggests a potential diagnostic role for anti-CarP antibodies in identifying RA patients early. CRP and ESR levels were significantly elevated in RA patients (Groups 1 and 2) compared to healthy controls (Group 3), indicating higher inflammatory activity in affected individuals. We also observed that anti-CarP antibodies had a specificity of 69.1% and a sensitivity of 78.2%. Positive correlations between the diagnosis of RA and anti-CarP antibody positivity were observed across the groups and correlated well with the inflammatory markers and signs such as joint damage. The data were found to be statistically significant. Conclusions Our study showed a significant correlation between joint damage and CRP levels and a positive correlation between anti-CarP antibodies and ESR and CRP values. These findings suggest that anti-CarP antibodies can offer certain advantages over RF and anti-CCP antibodies in RA diagnosis due to their early detection potential, higher specificity, complementary diagnostic role, and predictive value for disease severity.

Indexed as

anti-carp antibodiesanti-ccp antibodiesautoimmune diseasera factorrheumatoid arthriitis

Identifiers

PMID39092366
PMCPMC11293019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.