ArticleCureus2024
Antibiotic Management for Early-Onset Sepsis in Neonates With Gestational Ages of ≥ 34 Weeks: The Kaiser Sepsis Calculator Versus the 2010 CDC Guidelines.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A CBC drawn postnatally from umbilical cord blood can provide valuable diagnostic information for infants admitted to the NICU.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026Review
- Construction and validation of neonatal sepsis diagnostic nomograms: a single-site retrospective study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Antibiotic treatment for neonatal sepsis: changing trends and future directions.Drugs in context · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe traditional approach to neonatal early-onset sepsis (NEOS) management, involving maternal risk factors and nonspecific neonatal symptoms, usually leads to unnecessary antibiotic use. This study addresses these concerns by evaluating the Kaiser sepsis calculator (KSC) in guiding antibiotic therapy for NEOS, especially in high-incidence facilities (over 4/1,000 live births), by comparing it against the 2010 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines for neonates ≥34 weeks with suspected sepsis, thereby emphasizing its implications for personalized patient care.
methodsThis is a prospective observational study. All neonates of 34 gestational weeks or more, presenting with either maternal risk factors or sepsis symptoms within 12 hours of birth, were included in the study. The analysis focused on antibiotic recommendations by the 2010 CDC guidelines versus those by the KSC at presumed (0.5/1,000) and actual (16/1,000) sepsis incidence rates.
resultsNEOS was identified in 14 cases (14.1%). Compared to the KSC, at an incidence rate of 16 per 1,000, the KSC resulted in a significant 32.3% reduction in antibiotic treatment (74 cases (74.7%) vs. 42 cases (42.4%), respectively; p < 0.001). The calculator advised immediate antibiotic utilization for 13 out of 14 (92.9%) diagnosed cases, suggesting further evaluation for the remaining cases. When a presumed incidence of 0.5/1,000 was applied, the KSC indicated antibiotics less frequently than when using the actual rate of 16/1,000 (p<0.001) with two missed NEOS cases.
conclusionsUsing the KSC led to a decrease of 32 cases (32.3%) in unnecessary antibiotic prescriptions compared to adherence to 2010 CDC guidelines. However, setting a presumed incidence below the actual rate risked missing NEOS. The calculator was effective when actual local incidence rates were used, ensuring no missed cases needing antibiotics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.