ArticleCureus2024
Different Vortex Vein Anomalies Observed in a Single Case: Macular Vortex Vein in One Eye and Varix of Vortex Vein Ampulla in the Other Eye.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Varicosity of Vortex Vein Ampulla in Ocular Fundus: Descriptive Series of 53 Patients and Literature Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Varix of the vortex vein ampulla: a case report and imaging correlation.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We present a 56-year-old female with a macular vortex vein in her right eye and a varix of vortex vein ampulla in the inferior nasal fundus of her left eye. The choroidal lesions were evaluated by multimodal imaging including fundoscopy with contact lens, ultra-widefield fundus photography, swept-souse optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT), enface image of widefield optical coherence tomography (widefield enface-OCT), and ultra-widefield fundus angiography. Widefield enface-OCT revealed submacular large choroidal vessels in the right eye. Ultra-widefield indocyanine green fluorescence angiography (UWICGA) of the right eye showed the dye of those submacular choroidal vessels drained from the ampullae beneath the macula. Fundoscopy revealed an elevated lesion with crescent shadows in the inferior nasal fundus of the left eye. Dynamic fundoscopy with compression of the left eye resulted in a diminishing of the elevation and release of the compression resulted in an enlargement of the elevation. Ultra-widefield fundus photography of the left eye in the right inferior gaze revealed an elevated lesion with a crescent shadow in the inferior nasal fundus, while it is not prominent in the primary gaze. The B-scan of SS-OCT revealed a hyporeflective lesion in the choroid beneath the elevated lesion of the left eye. The elevated lesion was consistent with the vortex vein ampulla on UWICGA. This is the first case where two different choroidal vascular anomalies, macular vortex vein and varix of vortex ampulla, coexist in a single patient. Multimodal imaging is useful to visualize and diagnose choroidal vascular anomalies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.