Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39092307›Full record

ArticleClinics in orthopedic surgery2024

Cemented Versus Uncemented Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Treatment of Proximal Humerus Fractures: National Shoulder Arthroplasty Data from Türkiye.

Özlem Orhan, İbrahim Kaya, İzzet Bingöl, Baran Sarikaya, Mustafa Okan Ayvali, Naim Ata, M Mahir Ülgü, Şuayip Birinci, Fatih Karaaslan, H Çağdaş Basat and 1 more

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinics in orthopedic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Özlem OrhanDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Harran University, Faculty of Medicine, Şanlıurfa, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7508-135X
İbrahim KayaDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8205-6515
İzzet BingölDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Health Sciences University, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0097-3905
Baran SarikayaDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Health Sciences University, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9886-7221
Mustafa Okan AyvaliGeneral Directorate of Health Information Systems, Ministry of Health, Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0116-5152
Naim AtaGeneral Directorate of Health Information Systems, Ministry of Health, Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6947-2821
M Mahir ÜlgüGeneral Directorate of Health Information Systems, Ministry of Health, Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0825-1851
Şuayip BirinciMinistry of Health, Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8104-6198
Fatih KaraaslanDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Memorial Kayseri Hospital, Kayseri, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8283-3051
H Çağdaş BasatDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Kırşehir Ahi Evran University, Faculty of Medicine, Kırşehir, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3301-2529
Ministry of Health Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Scientific Research Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study evaluated national trends in cemented and uncemented reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) for proximal humerus fractures using a comprehensive national surgical database. This study aimed to compare RSA used in the treatment of proximal humerus fractures with the literature and to determine the country's trend. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted using the health records of individuals aged ≥ 18 years who underwent RSA for proximal humerus fractures between 2016 and 2022. Patients were divided into cemented and uncemented groups, and demographic data (age, sex), duration of hospital stay, transfusions, revisions, mortality, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) scores were analyzed. Results: A total of 618 cemented RSA and 1,364 uncemented RSA procedures were reviewed. Patients who underwent cemented RSA were significantly older than those who had uncemented RSA ( Conclusions: While cemented RSA has been gaining attention and increased application in recent years for proximal humerus fractures, uncemented RSA still predominates. The choice between these 2 methods is largely influenced by regional and hospital-level factors. The type of RSA and high CCI scores were found to have no significant impact on the risk of surgical revision.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, ShoulderBone CementsShoulder FracturesAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReoperationRetrospective StudiesBone CementsCementCharlson Comorbidity IndexNational trendsProximal humerus fractureReverse shoulder arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID39092307
PMCPMC11262942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.