ArticleClinics in orthopedic surgery2024
Reliability and Validity of the Martin Vigorimeter for Grip Strength Measurement in Korean Adults.
Article in Clinics in orthopedic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhancing cognitive and physical performance in older adults through wearable sensor-based interactive cognitive-motor training: a randomized clinical trial.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- Validity and Reliability of the InGripJournal of Korean medical science · 2026Article
- Comparing the digital dynamometer and Martin vigorimeter for handgrip strength: reliability, agreement, and prognostic value.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
- Definition and diagnosis of sarcopenia: Asia-Pacific perspectives.Osteoporosis and sarcopenia · 2025Review
- Efficacy of partial toe and iliac bone transfer for reconstruction of grade I-III fingers' defects.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Grip strength is important for fine motor skills, and one of the measurement tools for grip strength is the Martin Vigorimeter (MV) dynamometer. Studies on establishing the reliability and validity of the MV in Koreans are limited. We aimed to establish the reliability and validity of the MV for grip strength measurement in healthy Korean adults by comparing it with the Jamar dynamometer, the standard tool used by the American Society of Hand Therapists. Methods: In total, 99 healthy participants (50 men and 49 women) were enrolled. Grip strength was measured using the Jamar dynamometer and MV. Reliability and validity were assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and minimal detectable change (MDC). The correlation between the measurements of the instruments was analyzed using Pearson's correlation. The effect of hand anthropometry was evaluated, and the conversion equation between the instruments was calculated. Results: MV showed excellent reliability (ICC > 0.90, Conclusions: This study provides insights into the relationship between the Jamar and MV instruments for measuring grip strength in Koreans. The MV is a viable alternative to the Jamar dynamometer in Koreans, offering not only reproducible and reliable measurements of grip strength but also the advantage of being unaffected by variations in hand anthropometry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.