Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39092268›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Generation of cutting heat and simulation of core tube wall temperature during coring in primary structure coal seam.

Shujun Ma, Zhaofeng Wang, Jiwei Yue, Fenghua An, Haidong Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shujun MaSchool of Safety Science and Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo, Henan, 454000, China.
Zhaofeng WangSchool of Safety Science and Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo, Henan, 454000, China.
Jiwei YueSchool of Safety Science and Engineering, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan, Anhui, 232001, China.
Fenghua AnSchool of Safety Science and Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo, Henan, 454000, China.
Haidong ChenSchool of Safety Science and Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo, Henan, 454000, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When the drilling core method is used to determine the coalbed gas content, the cutting heat generated by the core bit cutting coal will increase the core tube temperature, and the excessively high core tube temperature will have an heating effect on the coal core, which will accelerate the coal core gas desorption rate and increase the gas loss amount. The generation of cutting heat of core bit and the measurement of core tube temperature are the basis for grasping the gas desorption law of coal core and projecting the amount of gas loss. Firstly, the self-developed core tube temperature measurement device was used to conduct on-site core temperature measurement experiments at different cutting speeds. Then, the cutting temperature of core bit was solved by establishing thermodynamic model for cutting coal and heat transfer model of cutting edge. Finally, based on the thermal conductivity characteristics of the core tube, the core tube temperature at different cutting speeds was simulated, and the simulated temperature was compared with the on-site measured temperature to verify the reliability of the model. The results show that when coring in primary structural coal, the temperature change trend of core tube wall temperature measurement point at different cutting speeds is basically consistent, the temperature measurement point at the front end of the core tube mainly goes through a relatively stable period in the drilling process, a sharp rising period in the cutting process, a slow rise and cooling period in the withdrawal process. However, the temperature measurement point at the back end of the core tube wall mainly goes through a relatively stable phase and a slowly increasing phase. The temperature rise of the core bit and the core tube wall are significantly positively correlated with the cutting speed. When coring in hard coal seam and the core depth is not large, the cutting heat generated by the core bit and the coal body is the dominant factor for the temperature rise of the core tube. The core tube wall temperature calculated using the model matches well with the field measured temperature, and the error is small, which fully shows that the coring thermodynamic model is feasible. This study provides a basis for further research on the dynamic distribution characteristic of coal core temperature during coring, which is of profound significance to calculate the gas loss and coalbed gas content.

Indexed as

Coalbed gas contentCore tube temperatureCutting heatCutting speedSampling process of core tube

Identifiers

PMID39092268
PMCPMC11292237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.