ArticleHeliyon2024
In-vitro safety assessment of meropenem on human retinal pigment epithelium (RPE).
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stability Study of Meropenem 50 mg/mL Eye Drops in Polypropylene Dropper Bottles.Pharmaceutics · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Endophthalmitis is a severe infection accompanied by inflammation that affects the anterior and posterior parts of the eye. It is typically treated with a combination of antibiotics that cover various microorganisms. However, retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) cells are highly susceptible to damage from intravitreal injection therapy. This study aimed to investigate the impact of clinically relevant concentrations of meropenem (alone or in combination with vancomycin) on the viability and inflammation of RPE cells. Design: In-vitro Study. Methods: RPE cells from passages 5-7 were treated with different concentrations of meropenem (1/4x, x, and 4x; [x = 16 mg/L]), vancomycin (30 mg/L), and meropenem (x) plus vancomycin for 24 h. The morphology assessment and MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) assay were performed to evaluate cytotoxicity due to drug treatment. Real-time PCR was used to measure the relative expression of apoptotic genes (BCL-2 and BAX) and inflammation biomarkers (IL-1b and IL-6). Results: Meropenem (alone or in combination with vancomycin) did not have any significant effect on RPE cell morphology, density, and viability. Gene expression analysis confirmed these results, showing no significant changes in the BCL-2/BAX ratio in drug-treated RPE cells compared to controls. Treatment with meropenem significantly induced the expression of IL-1b at all studied concentrations. Additionally, at concentrations of x and 4x, it also significantly increased the expression of IL-6, which was dose-dependent. However, this effect was not observed with vancomycin alone or in combination with meropenem. Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that meropenem, either alone or in combination with vancomycin, does not induce RPE cytotoxicity. There was an upregulation of IL-1b and IL-6 in meropenem monotherapy, the clinical implication of which should be elucidated in future in-vivo or clinical studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.