Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39092235›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2024

A standardized

Anju Majeed, Shaheen Majeed, G Satish, R Manjunatha, Shaikh Nawazish Rabbani, Neelanagowda V P Patil, Lakshmi Mundkur

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Effect ofNutrients · 2026
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Crystal structure and Hirshfeld surface analysis of 3-acetyl-11-keto-β-boswellic acid.Acta crystallographica. Section E, Crystallographic communications · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Therapeutic Efficacy of Medicinal Plants with Allopathic Medicine in Musculoskeletal Diseases.International journal of plant, animal and environmental sciences · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anju MajeedSami-Sabinsa Group Limited, Peenya Industrial Area Bangalore, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Shaheen MajeedSabinsa Corporation, East Windsor, NJ, United States.
G SatishSami-Sabinsa Group Limited, Peenya Industrial Area Bangalore, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
R ManjunathaSami-Sabinsa Group Limited, Peenya Industrial Area Bangalore, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Shaikh Nawazish RabbaniNuha Hospital, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Neelanagowda V P PatilKR Hospital, Department of Orthopedics, Mysore Medical College and Research Institute K R Hospital, Mysore, Karnataka, India.
Lakshmi MundkurSami-Sabinsa Group Limited, Peenya Industrial Area Bangalore, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Boswellin Methods: Based on the inclusion/exclusion criteria, 105 newly diagnosed participants with degenerative hypertrophy OA were recruited and randomized into Placebo, BSE-150 mg or BSE-300 mg (n = 35 in each group) to receive either 150 mg or 300 mg BSE or a placebo tablet twice a day for 90 days. All the participants were evaluated for pain and physical function using the standard tools including the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Lequesne Functional Index (LFI), EuroQol- 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) quality of life, 6-min walk test at day 0, days 5, 30, 60 and 90 of treatment. Additionally, the circulating levels of inflammatory biomarkers, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNFα), high-sensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), and interleukin-6 (IL-6) were evaluated. Safety was evaluated by blood biochemical, hematological analysis, urinary analyses and by monitoring adverse events throughout the study. Results: Ninety-eight subjects completed the study. Improvements in pain scores were observed as early as 5 days after the start of the supplement in the BSE-150 and BSE-300 groups. By 90 days, the VAS pain score reduced by 45.3% and 61.9%, WOMAC- total score improved by 68.5% and 73.6% in the BSE-150 and BSE-300 groups respectively. WOMAC pain (70.2%, 73.9%, WOMAC stiffness (65.6%,68.9%), WOMAC function (68.8%,74.2%), LFI severity (50%,53.3%), decreased and EQ5D (56.9%, 62.9%) and distance walked in 6 minutes (21.2%, 21.9%) improved in the BSE-150 and BSE-300 groups in 90 days. Further, the levels of TNFα, hs-CRP, and IL-6 were found to decrease in the serum in BSE-supplemented participants. No significant adverse events were recorded during the study. Conclusion: The study confirms that Clinical Trial Registration: https://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/pmaindet2.php?EncHid=NzU2Nzc=&Enc=&userName=CTRI, identifier CTRI/2022/11/047397.

Indexed as

3-acetyl-11-keto-β-boswellic acidBoswellia serrata extractBoswellin Superlequesne functional index quality of lifeosteoarthritisvisual analog scaleWOMAC

Identifiers

PMID39092235
PMCPMC11291344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.