ArticleRoyal Society open science2024
Bayesian cluster geographically weighted regression for spatial heterogeneous data.
Article in Royal Society open science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Older adults life expectancy in China: Bayesian mortality estimation and spatially heterogeneous determinants.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Modeling the drivers of mumps incidence in China: a spatial multi-method analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- A multi-method spatial analysis of dysentery incidence determinants across Chinese provinces.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spatial statistical models are commonly used in geographical scenarios to ensure spatial variation is captured effectively. However, spatial models and cluster algorithms can be complicated and expensive. One of these algorithms is geographically weighted regression (GWR) which was proposed in the geography literature to allow relationships in a regression model to vary over space. In contrast to traditional linear regression models, which have constant regression coefficients over space, regression coefficients are estimated locally at spatially referenced data points with GWR. The motivation for the adaption of GWR is the idea that a set of constant regression coefficients cannot adequately capture spatially varying relationships between covariates and an outcome variable. GWR has been applied widely in diverse fields, such as ecology, forestry, epidemiology, neurology and astronomy. While frequentist GWR gives us point estimates and confidence intervals, Bayesian GWR enriches our understanding by including prior knowledge and providing probability distributions for parameters and predictions of interest. This paper pursues three main objectives. First, it introduces covariate effect clustering by integrating a Bayesian geographically weighted regression (BGWR) with a post-processing step that includes Gaussian mixture model and the Dirichlet process mixture model. Second, this paper examines situations in which a particular covariate holds significant importance in one region but not in another in the Bayesian framework. Lastly, it addresses computational challenges in existing BGWR, leading to enhancements in Markov chain Monte Carlo estimation suitable for large spatial datasets. The efficacy of the proposed method is demonstrated using simulated data and is further validated in a case study examining children's development domains in Queensland, Australia, using data provided by Children's Health Queensland and Australia's Early Development Census.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.