ArticleEuropean journal of midwifery2024
Implementation of aspirin use during pregnancy in community midwifery-led care in the Netherlands: A pilot survey.
Article in European journal of midwifery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAspirin nowadays is widely used in pregnancy, but implementation among gynecologists took nearly four decades. For a complete insight in the implementation of aspirin, community midwives are to be involved. Community midwives do not have authority to prescribe aspirin and have to refer to a general practitioner or consultant obstetrician for a prescription.
methodsThe study was an online, national pilot survey about the implementation of aspirin use during pregnancy among independently practicing community midwives consisting of 29 items with five categories: background, advising, prescribing, possible indications, and clinical practice.
resultsForty-seven community midwives completed the survey between April and May 2021. All respondents had experience on advising aspirin use in pregnancy. History of preterm pre-eclampsia or HELLP syndrome was identified as a risk factor for developing utero-placental complications by 97.9% of the community midwives. Moderate risk factors in women with otherwise low-risk pregnancy were identified by >75% of the participants. Practical issues in prescribing aspirin were experienced by one-third of the respondents. Suggestions were made to obtain authority for community midwives to prescribe aspirin and improve collaboration with consultant obstetricians and general practitioners.
conclusionsCommunity midwives seem to be adequate in identifying risk factors for developing utero-placental complications in women with otherwise low-risk pregnancy. Practical issues for prescribing aspirin occur often. Obtaining authority for community midwives to prescribe aspirin after education should be considered and consulting a consultant obstetrician should become more accessible to overcome the practical issues. Further educating community midwives and general practitioners might improve implementation rates and perinatal outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.