Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39091980›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X2024

Vaginal assisted NOTES hysterectomy in The Netherlands; A prospective cohort study.

Ilse P W Bekkers, Rebecca Henschen, Nicol A C Smeets, Huib A A M van Vliet, Anne Damoiseaux, Martine M L H Wassen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ilse P W BekkersDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Zuyderland Medical Centre Heerlen, Henri Dunantstraat 5, 6419 PC Heerlen, Limburg, the Netherlands.
Rebecca HenschenDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Zuyderland Medical Centre Heerlen, Henri Dunantstraat 5, 6419 PC Heerlen, Limburg, the Netherlands.
Nicol A C SmeetsDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Zuyderland Medical Centre Heerlen, Henri Dunantstraat 5, 6419 PC Heerlen, Limburg, the Netherlands.
Huib A A M van VlietDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Catharina Hospital Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Anne DamoiseauxDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Catharina Hospital Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Martine M L H WassenDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Zuyderland Medical Centre Heerlen, Henri Dunantstraat 5, 6419 PC Heerlen, Limburg, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Vaginal assisted Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) combines the benefits of vaginal and endoscopic surgery. This study presents the results of the first vaginal assisted NOTES hysterectomies (VANH) in The Netherlands. Study design: A prospective cohort study was performed in two non-academic teaching hospitals in The Netherlands. Data was collected from patients who underwent a VANH for benign indications between August 2019 and April 2023. Baseline characteristics and data of intra- and postoperative surgical outcomes were recorded and analysed. The VANHs were performed by four experienced vaginal and endoscopic gynaecological surgeons. Results: A total of 200 patients underwent a VANH. Indications were dysfunctional menstrual bleeding (61 %; n = 122), abnormal cervical cytology (15.5 %; n = 31), abdominal pain (11.5 %; n = 23), post ablation/sterilization pain syndrome (3.5 %; n = 7), uterine fibroids (5.0 %; n = 10), atypical endometrial hyperplasia (2.5 %; n = 5) and Lynch or BRCA gene mutation carriers (1.0 %, n = 2). The mean surgical time was 61.4 min ( ± 22.8 min) with a mean blood loss of 88 mL ( ± 89 mL) and a mean uterine weight of 150 g ( ± 112 g). In 2.0 % (n = 4) of the cases a conversion was necessary. Same day discharge (SDD) was feasible in 80.2 % (n = 105) of the patients planned in day-care. In 2.0 % (n = 4) an intra-operative complication and in 9.0 % (n = 18) a post-operative complication occurred. Conclusion: This study shows vNOTES to be a safe and feasible surgical technique and can be safely implemented with appropriate patient selection and skilled surgeons. It highlights the importance of surgeon awareness of the challenges inherent in the initial stages of the implementation of a new surgical technique when performing their first vNOTES procedures. Additional randomized clinical trials are needed to show superiority of vNOTES compared to traditional surgery.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyVaginal assisted NOTES hysterectomyVaginal hysterectomyVNOTES

Identifiers

PMID39091980
PMCPMC11292541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.