ArticleHeliyon2024
Altitude and prognosis after PCI: A propensity score-matched analysis.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrated multi-omics reveals population-specific mechanisms of cardiovascular disease in high-altitude environments.iScience · 2026Article
- The impact of altitude on coronary artery disease severity in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome patients: a quasi-experimental study.Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2025Article
- Bridging ancient wisdom and modern technology: an AI and multi-omics framework for three causes tailored treatment in personalized medicine.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The impact of altitude on the prognosis of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) deserves further discussion and research. Methods: We conducted a post hoc analysis of a prospective observational study involving 5453 patients post-PCI, divided into medium-altitude and low-altitude groups. To control for confounding factors, propensity score matching was employed to pair patients with similar baseline characteristics between the two groups. The impact of altitude factors on patients' prognosis post-PCI was examined through endpoint events over a 2-year follow-up period. Results: During the 2-year follow-up, patients at medium altitude exhibited a lower risk of MACE (including cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, revascularization, and stroke) compared to those at low altitude (1196 versus 1196 patients [medium-altitude versus low-altitude, respectively]; hazard ratio [HR], 0.781 [95 % CI, 0.629-0.969]; P = 0.025) during 2-year follow-up. Even after excluding stroke, a significant difference in heart-related adverse events (HRAE) persisted between the two groups (HR, 0.794; 95 % CI, 0.636-0.991; P = 0.042). The incidences of individual MACE components were not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusions: Patients post-PCI residing at medium altitude exhibited a lower risk of 2-year MACE compared to those at low altitude. Further research is necessary to provide more robust evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.