ArticleHeliyon2024
Albumin-dNLR score could be an etiological criterion to determine inflammation burden for GLIM in medical inpatients over 70 years old: A multicenter retrospective study.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: To validate the role of the albumin-derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte (ALB-dNLR) score in diagnosing malnutrition in medical inpatients over 70 years old. Methods: This is a retrospective cross-sectional study involving 7 departments from 14 Chinese hospitals. The ALB-dNLR score was calculated, and outcomes between groups with positive and negative ALB-dNLR scores were compared after propensity score matching (PSM). Afterwards, the outcomes were compared between the groups receiving nutrition support and those not receiving support among malnourished patients diagnosed using the Global Leadership Initiative Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria after PSM. Results: Out of 10,184 cases, 6165 were eligible. 2200 cases were in the positive ALB-dNLR score group. After PSM, 1458 pairs were analyzed, showing lower in-hospital mortality (0.8 % vs. 2.1 %, p = 0.005) and a lower nosocomial infection rate (5.9 % vs. 11.0 %, p < 0.001) in the negative ALB-dNLR score group. In malnourished patients, 259 pairs were analyzed after PSM. It showed better outcomes in mortality (0.8 % vs. 3.5 %, p = 0.033), nosocomial infection rate (5.4 % vs. 15.4 %, p < 0.001), length of stay (LOS) (13.8 ± 10.3 vs. 18.4 ± 14.1, p < 0.001), and total hospital cost (3315.3 ± 2946.4 vs. 4795.3 ± 4198.2, p < 0.001) in the support group. In malnourished patients with ALB-dNLR score as the sole etiological criterion, 94 pairs were calculated. It showed better outcomes in mortality (0.0 % vs. 6.4 %, p = 0.029), nosocomial infection rate (7.4 % vs. 18.1 %, p = 0.029), LOS (13.7 ± 8.3 vs. 19.8 ± 15.2, p = 0.001), and total hospital cost (3379.3 ± 2955.6 vs. 4471.2 ± 4782.4, p = 0.029) in the support group. Conclusions: The ALB-dNLR score was validated to predict in-hospital mortality in medical inpatients over 70 years old. Malnutrition patients diagnosed by the GLIM criteria and using the ALB-dNLR score might benefit from nutrition support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.