ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024
Cryopreservation of neuroectoderm on a pillar plate and
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cryopreservation in cryovials extends cell storage at low temperatures, and advances in organoid cryopreservation improve reproducibility and reduce generation time. However, cryopreserving human organoids presents challenges due to the limited diffusion of cryoprotective agents (CPAs) into the organoid core and the potential toxicity of these agents. To overcome these obstacles, we developed a cryopreservation technique using a pillar plate platform. To illustrate cryopreservation application to human brain organoids (HBOs), early-stage HBOs were produced by differentiating induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) into neuroectoderm (NEs) in an ultralow atachement (ULA) 384-well plate. These NEs were transferred and encapsulated in Matrigel on the pillar plate. The early-stage HBOs on the pillar plate were exposed to four commercially available CPAs, including PSC cryopreservation kit, CryoStor CS10, 3dGRO, and 10% DMSO, before being frozen overnight at -80°C and subsequently stored in a liquid nitrogen dewar. We examined the impact of CPA type, organoid size, and CPA exposure duration on cell viability post-thaw. Additionally, the differentiation of early-stage HBOs on the pillar plate was assessed using RT-qPCR and immunofluorescence staining. The PSC cryopreservation kit proved to be the least toxic for preserving these HBOs on the pillar plate. Notably, smaller HBOs showed higher cell viability post-cryopreservation than larger ones. An incubation period of 80 minutes with the PSC kit was essential to ensure optimal CPA diffusion into HBOs with a diameter of 400 - 600 μm. These cryopreserved early-stage HBOs successfully matured over 30 days, exhibiting gene expression patterns akin to non-cryopreserved HBOs. The cryopreserved early-stage HBOs on the pillar plate maintained high viability after thawing and successfully differentiated into mature HBOs. This on-chip cryopreservation method could extend to other small organoids, by integrating cryopreservation, thawing, culturing, staining, rinsing, and imaging processes within a single system, thereby preserving the 3D structure of the organoids.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.