Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39091826›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024

PairK: Pairwise k-mer alignment for quantifying protein motif conservation in disordered regions.

Jackson C Halpin, Amy E Keating

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jackson C HalpinMIT Department of Biology, 77 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02139.ORCID 0000-0003-4085-1064
Amy E KeatingMIT Department of Biology, 77 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02139.ORCID 0000-0003-4074-8980

Funding

Computational and Experimental Investigation and Design of Protein Interaction SpecificityR35GM149227 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI AMY E KEATING · 2023 to 2026
$2.2M
Investigation of the design, structure and mechanism of Mena protein interaction inhibitorsF32GM137510 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI HALPIN, JACKSON · 2021 to 2022
$136k
NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM137510NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM149227
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein-protein interactions are often mediated by a modular peptide recognition domain binding to a short linear motif (SLiM) in the disordered region of another protein. The ability to predict domain-SLiM interactions would allow researchers to map protein interaction networks, predict the effects of perturbations to those networks, and develop biologically meaningful hypotheses. Unfortunately, sequence database searches for SLiMs generally yield mostly biologically irrelevant motif matches or false positives. To improve the prediction of novel SLiM interactions, researchers employ filters to discriminate between biologically relevant and improbable motif matches. One promising criterion for identifying biologically relevant SLiMs is the sequence conservation of the motif, exploiting the fact that functional motifs are more likely to be conserved than spurious motif matches. However, the difficulty of aligning disordered regions has significantly hampered the utility of this approach. We present PairK (pairwise k-mer alignment), an MSA-free method to quantify motif conservation in disordered regions. PairK outperforms both standard MSA-based conservation scores and a modern LLM-based conservation score predictor on the task of identifying biologically important motif instances. PairK can quantify conservation over wider phylogenetic distances than MSAs, indicating that SLiMs may be more conserved than is implied by MSA-based metrics. PairK is available as open-source code at https://github.com/jacksonh1/pairk.

Identifiers

PMID39091826
PMCPMC11291154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.