ArticleTranslational gastroenterology and hepatology2024
Development and validation of an individualized nomogram for gastric cancer patients treated with perioperative chemotherapy followed by radical surgery.
Article in Translational gastroenterology and hepatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recurrence of gastric cancer with Krukenberg tumor, presenting with a high alpha-fetoprotein level, a case report.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Clinical prognosis evaluation of alpha-fetoprotein-positive gastric cancer: comprehensive analysis and development of a novel nomogram for survival prediction.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Prognostic factors are complicated and changeable for locally advanced gastric cancer (GC) patients. This study aimed to perform a novel prognostic model on survival for locally advanced GC patients who have received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical surgery. Methods: The locally advanced GC patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy were included in this study from Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University. A nomogram was developed based on independent prognostic factors identified through a multivariable Cox regression model. Model performance was evaluated in training and independent external cohorts in terms of calibration, discrimination, and clinical usefulness. Results: A total of 273 patients received radical resections. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for all patients were 43.8 and 61.2 months, respectively. Nomogram showed that Lauren type made the greatest contribution to prognosis, followed by ypN. The prognostic nomogram had excellent discriminative ability, with a C-index of 0.689 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.661-0.716], and an area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) of 0.778, 0.746, and 0.725 for 3-, 5- and 10-year OS, respectively. Similar results were obtained in the external validation cohort. Based on the nomogram, the whole cohort was divided into high-risk and low-risk groups. And risk group classification was significantly associated with clinical characteristics, and produced an AUC value of 0.781, 0.748, and 0.727 for 3-, 5- and 10-year OS, respectively. Furthermore, compared with the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging system (8th edition), Japanese criteria, and German criteria, the decision curve analysis (DCA) graphically demonstrated that the new model had more optimal net benefits in predicting the 3-, 5-, and 10-year OS for GC patients. Both C-index and time-dependent ROC curve demonstrated that the nomogram had a stronger capability for accurately predicting prognosis compared with the other staging system. Conclusions: The nomogram model is an effective support tool to predict OS in GC patients undergoing perioperative chemotherapy followed by radical surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.