ReviewTranslational gastroenterology and hepatology2024
Role of endoscopy in the diagnosis of coeliac disease: a narrative review.
Review in Translational gastroenterology and hepatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- High prevalence of ultra-short celiac disease in children with low anti-tissue transglutaminase immunoglobulin A levels: The risk of misdiagnosis without bulb biopsy.Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition · 2026Observational
- Unraveling the Complexity of Celiac Disease: A Narrative Review of Its Multisystem Nature.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Non-Diarrheal Celiac Disease in Iraq: A Multicenter study.Middle East journal of digestive diseases · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: Coeliac disease (CD) is a common autoimmune disorder triggered by gluten consumption in genetically predisposed individuals. CD is characterised by chronic inflammation in the small bowel mucosa with an influx of lymphocytes, followed by crypt hyperplasia and villous atrophy. The gold standard test to diagnose CD is endoscopy with duodenal biopsies. However, variations in practice between endoscopists can lead to missed diagnoses. This review aims to discuss the role of endoscopy in the diagnosis of CD, highlighting the performance measures of endoscopy in CD and the advancement in endoscopic techniques for the optical diagnosis of villous atrophy. Methods: We searched PubMed and Google Scholar from their inception to December 2023 for relevant articles on the role of endoscopy in CD. Two authors reviewed these references, and relevant studies were included in the discussion section of this review. Key Content and Findings: We provide an up-to-date assessment of the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic markers of CD and the performance of enhanced endoscopic imaging to identify villous atrophy during endoscopy. We propose a set of benchmarks for endoscopy in CD and discuss the potential role of artificial intelligence (AI) in the endoscopic diagnosis of CD. Conclusions: Performing high-quality endoscopy and identifying strategies to reduce inter-endoscopist variations may reduce missed diagnoses. Adopting advanced endoscopic techniques and embracing new technologies such as AI could enhance diagnostic accuracy and improve patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.