ArticleTranslational gastroenterology and hepatology2024
Association of textbook outcomes with improved survival in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma following pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective study.
Article in Translational gastroenterology and hepatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Assessing the perioperative outcomes of pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) based solely on individual complications is not comprehensive, and the association between perioperative outcomes and the long-term prognosis of individuals diagnosed with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains uncertain. Our study is designed to evaluate the impact of a novel composite indicator, textbook outcomes (TO), on the long-term prognosis of patients undergoing PD for PDAC. Methods: This study conducted a retrospective analysis of 139 patients who underwent PD for pathologically confirmed PDAC at our hospital between January 2018 and December 2021. After applying exclusion criteria, a total of 111 patients were included in the subsequent analysis. These patients were categorized into two groups: the non-TO group (n=42) and the TO group (n=69). The Kaplan-Meier survival curve was employed to describe the relationship between TO and disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Cox regression was employed to assess the impact of achieving TO on long-term survival. Logistic regression was employed to investigate the risk factors affecting the achievement of TO. Results: Out of the 111 PDAC patients, 69 (62.2%) achieved TO following PD. The achievement of TO significantly improved the OS of PDAC patients [P=0.03; hazard ratio (HR) =0.60; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.37-0.83]. Cox regression analysis indicated that achieving TO was a protective factor for OS (P=0.04; HR =4.08; 95% CI: 1.07-15.61). Logistic regression analysis indicated that high amylase in drainage fluid on the third day after surgery (>1,300 U/L) was detrimental to achieve TO [odds ratio (OR) =0.10; 95% CI: 0.02-0.58; P=0.01], longer surgery durations (≥6.25 hours) was detrimental to achieve TO (OR =0.19; 95% CI: 0.06-0.54; P=0.002), and soft pancreatic texture was detrimental to achieve TO (OR =0.31; 95% CI: 0.10-0.93, P=0.04). Conclusions: Achievement of TO significantly improves the OS of PDAC patients and has the potential to serve as a robust prognostic indicator. Looking ahead, it is highly necessary for TO to become a standard surgical quality control measure in hospitals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.