Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39091643›Full record

ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2024

Clinical Utility of Plasma Microbial Cell-Free DNA Sequencing Among Immunocompromised Patients With Pneumonia.

Deng B Madut, Roy F Chemaly, Sanjeet S Dadwal, Joshua A Hill, Yeon Joo Lee, Ghady Haidar, Alfred Luk, Alexander Drelick, Peter V Chin-Hong, Esther Benamu and 30 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Invasive Aspergillosis in the Intensive Care Unit.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  6. What's Hot in Transplant Infectious Diseases?Transplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation Society
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

40 authors.

Deng B MadutDuke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4023-3928
Roy F ChemalyThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Sanjeet S DadwalCity of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte California, USA.
Joshua A HillFred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8442-3857
Yeon Joo LeeMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Ghady HaidarUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Alfred LukTulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2598-1031
Alexander DrelickWeill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Peter V Chin-HongUniversity of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Esther BenamuUniversity of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Fareed KhawajaThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4424-283X
Deepa NanayakkaraCity of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4310-3275
Genovefa A PapanicolaouMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Catherine Butkus SmallWeill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Monica FungUniversity of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1725-5259
Michelle BarronUniversity of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Thomas DavisIndiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis Indiana, USA.
Micah T McClainDuke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Eileen K MaziarzDuke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Armando D BedoyaDuke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Daniel L GilstrapDuke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Jamie L ToddDuke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Christina E BarkauskasDuke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Madeleine R HeldmanDuke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Robert BigelowDuke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Jeffrey D LeimbergerDuke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Ephraim L TsalikDuke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Olivia WolfDuke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Mona MugharKarius Inc., Redwood City, California, USA.
Constance LauKarius Inc., Redwood City, California, USA.
Nicholas NollKarius Inc., Redwood City, California, USA.
Desiree HollemonKarius Inc., Redwood City, California, USA.
Radha DuttaguptaKarius Inc., Redwood City, California, USA.
Daniel S LupuKarius Inc., Redwood City, California, USA.
Sivan BercoviciKarius Inc., Redwood City, California, USA.
Bradley A PerkinsKarius Inc., Redwood City, California, USA.
Timothy A BlauwkampKarius Inc., Redwood City, California, USA.
Vance G FowlerDuke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Thomas L HollandDuke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Stephen P BerginDuke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Plasma microbial cell-free DNA (mcfDNA) sequencing can establish the etiology of multiple infectious syndromes by identifying microbial DNA in plasma. However, data are needed to define the clinical scenarios where this tool offers the highest clinical benefit. Methods: We conducted a prospective multicenter observational study that evaluated the impact of plasma mcfDNA sequencing compared with usual care testing among adults with hematologic malignancies. This is a secondary analysis of an expanded cohort that evaluated the clinical utility of plasma mcfDNA sequencing across prespecified and adjudicated outcomes. We examined the percentage of participants for whom plasma mcfDNA sequencing identified a probable cause of pneumonia or clinically relevant nonpneumonia infection. We then assessed potential changes in antimicrobial therapy based on plasma mcfDNA sequencing results and the potential for early mcfDNA testing to avoid bronchoscopy and its associated adverse events. Results: Of 223 participants, at least 1 microbial detection by plasma mcfDNA sequencing was adjudicated as a probable cause of pneumonia in 57 (25.6%) and a clinically relevant nonpneumonia infection in 88 (39.5%). A probable cause of pneumonia was exclusively identified by plasma mcfDNA sequencing in 23 (10.3%) participants. Antimicrobial therapy would have changed for 41 (18.4%) participants had plasma mcfDNA results been available in real time. Among the 57 participants with a probable cause of pneumonia identified by plasma mcfDNA sequencing, bronchoscopy identified no additional probable cause of pneumonia in 52 (91.2%). Conclusions: Plasma mcfDNA sequencing could improve management of both pneumonia and other concurrent infections in immunocompromised patients with suspected pneumonia.

Indexed as

immunocompromisedmicrobial cell-free DNA sequencingpneumonia

Identifiers

PMID39091643
PMCPMC11292041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.