Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39091638›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of kidney health and disease2024

The Use of Kidneys With Lower Longevity From Deceased Donors to Improve Access to Preemptive Renal Transplantation for Elderly Patients: A Qualitative Study.

Carina Sancho, Aliya Affdal, Fabián-Andrés Ballesteros Gallego, Marie-Françoise Malo, Savannah-Lou Cochran-Mavrikakis, Héloise Cardinal, John S Gill, Marie-Chantal Fortin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of kidney health and disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Carina SanchoBioethics Program, École de santé publique de l'Université de Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Aliya AffdalBioethics Program, École de santé publique de l'Université de Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Fabián-Andrés Ballesteros GallegoCentre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Québec, Canada.
Marie-Françoise MaloBioethics Program, École de santé publique de l'Université de Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Savannah-Lou Cochran-MavrikakisDepartment of Philosophy, Faculté des arts et des sciences, Université de Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Héloise CardinalCentre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Québec, Canada.
John S GillDivision of Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Marie-Chantal FortinCentre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Québec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8437-0556

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: There is a gap between the number of patients waiting for a transplant and the number of kidneys available. Some deceased donor kidneys are currently nonutilized, as medical teams fear that they will experience suboptimal graft survival. However, these organs could provide an acceptable therapeutic option if they were allocated for preemptive kidney transplantation in elderly candidates. Objective: This project aims to gather patients' perspectives on the allocation of kidneys with lower longevity for preemptive kidney transplantation in elderly patients. Design: Individual interviews. Setting: The Center hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM) chronic kidney disease (CKD) clinic. Participants: Patients aged between 64 and 75 years with CKD G4-5 ND, followed at the CHUM and who have not initiated dialysis yet. Methods: Between March and July 2023, we conducted 14 individual interviews with patients aged between 64 and 75 years who had CKD G4-5 ND and were followed at the CHUM. The interviews were digitally recorded and transcribed. Thematic analysis was conducted. Results: Most participants were in favor of using kidneys with lower longevity to increase their access to transplantation, improve their quality of life, enable accelerated transplantation, and avoid dialysis. Patients also wanted to be engaged in the decision-making process, underlining the importance of informed consent. Although the use of kidneys with lower longevity offers the hope of returning to "normal" life, some patients were concerned about the risk of reduced graft survival and the need for a subsequent kidney transplant. In these cases, patients were interested in using mitigation strategies, such as prioritization for kidney transplantation from standard donors in case of early graft loss associated with receiving kidneys with lower longevity. They also recommended the development of a separate waiting list for patients consenting to preemptive transplantation with kidneys with lower longevity. Limitations: This study was conducted in only 1 nephrology clinic in the province of Quebec with French-speaking patients. Consequently, the results may not be generalizable to other populations, including ethnic minorities. Conclusion: The use of kidneys with lower longevity for preemptive kidney transplantation appears to be an interesting option for elderly kidney transplant candidates. However, patient information and participation in the decision-making process are essential. Moreover, organ donation organizations and transplant programs should develop a separate waitlist for transplant candidates who have preconsented to receive organ offers of deceased donor kidneys with lower longevity. Trial registration: Not registered.

Indexed as

elderly patientsethicsnonutilized kidneyspreemptive transplantationqualitative interviews

Identifiers

PMID39091638
PMCPMC11292676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.