Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39091600›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of educational research open2022

Developing future translational scientists through authentic learning and assessments.

Emma Tumilty, Heidi Spratt, Christina Cestone, Kevin Wooten, Judith Aronson, Jonathan Hommel, Mark R Hellmich, Celia Chao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of educational research open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Cross-Institutional Collaborations to Cultivate Translational Scientists: Implications for Broadening Participation and Workforce Development in US Higher Education.Biochemistry and molecular biology education : a bimonthly publication of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Emma TumiltyDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Population Health, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.
Heidi SprattDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Population Health, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.
Christina CestoneFaculty Center for Teaching and Learning and Graduate School, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD.
Kevin WootenHuman Pathophysiology and Translational Medicine Graduate Program, Institute for Translational Sciences, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.
Judith AronsonHuman Pathophysiology and Translational Medicine Graduate Program, Institute for Translational Sciences, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.
Jonathan HommelHuman Pathophysiology and Translational Medicine Graduate Program, Institute for Translational Sciences, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.
Mark R HellmichHuman Pathophysiology and Translational Medicine Graduate Program, Institute for Translational Sciences, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.
Celia ChaoHuman Pathophysiology and Translational Medicine Graduate Program, Institute for Translational Sciences, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.

Funding

UTMB Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR001439 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MED BR GALVESTON · PI URBAN, RANDALL J · 2015 to 2024
$40.0M
UTMB CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE AWARD: NASA BED REST STUDIESUL1RR029876 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MED BR GALVESTON · PI BRASIER, ALLAN R. · 2009 to 2011
$17.7M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001439NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR029876
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Interprofessional Research Design course uses authentic learning pedagogy to bring together students from different education tracks (PhD, MD, MD/PhD training) to engage in interprofessional collaborative skills toward completion of a capstone project, a National Health Institutes (NIH) R21-style grant proposal. The course, underpinned by principles of team science, begins with a leadership training workshop to introduce students to effective leadership and teamwork strategies for interprofessional team environments. We used several assessments during the course to monitor leadership and team dynamics. We analyzed three assessments (leadership self-efficacy testing, iterative team contracts and reflective essays) to better understand students' learning experiences. Self-efficacy testing was administered before leadership training (pre) and at the end of the course (post-then); scores were analyzed using a repeated repeated measures ANOVA. Iterative team contracts were analyzed qualitatively using both deductive and descriptive methods. Reflective essays were analyzed using a general inductive approach. Nine teams of 32 students (23 MD; 9 PhD) participated in the class over 2017-2018. Self-efficacy testing using post-then timing to control for response shift showed a statistically significant increase in self-efficacy across all measures. Deductive qualitative analysis of iterative contracting showed evidence of team processes which support successful team performance; and descriptive analysis mapped productive behaviors. In reflective essays, seven of the nine teams collectively described their experiences positively; e.g., themes included empathizing with group members, sophisticated communication and collaborative workflow/styles. For negative experiences, themes were related to basic communication, poor integration and the theory-practice gap of leadership training. These findings demonstrate the usefulness of an authentic learning pedagogy focused on teaching the practice of team science.

Indexed as

communicationgraduate studentsinterprofessional educationleadershipmedical studentsteam sciencetranslational science

Identifiers

PMID39091600
PMCPMC11293494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.