ArticleBiosensors & bioelectronics: X2024
A digital microfluidic device integrated with electrochemical sensor and 3D matrix for detecting soluble PD-L1.
Article in Biosensors & bioelectronics: X, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Triple-mode point-of-care diagnostics for high-risk human papillomavirus in urine.Biosensors & bioelectronics: X · 2025Article
- An Integrated Digital Microfluidic Device for the Extraction and Detection of Extracellular Vesicle-Based Molecules.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025Article
- Nucleic acid amplification tests in digital microfluidics: the promise of next-generation point-of-care diagnostics.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2025Review
- A microfluidic electrochemical immunosensor for detection of CEA and Ki67 in 3D tumor spheroids.Materials today. Bio · 2025Article
- Inkjet-printed electronics for rapid and low-cost prototyping of digital microfluidic devices using an off-the-shelf printer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PD1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors are at the forefront of cancer immunotherapies. However, the overall response rate remains only 10-30%. Even among initial responders, drug resistance often occurs, which can lead to prolonged use of a futile therapy in the race with the fatal disease. It would be ideal to closely monitor key indicators of patients' immune responsiveness, such as circulating PD-L1 levels. Traditional PD-L1 detection methods, such as ELISA, are limited in sensitivity and rely on core lab facilities, preventing their use for the regular monitoring. Electrochemical sensors exist as an attractive candidate for point-of-care tool, yet, streamlining multiple processes in a single platform remains a challenge. To overcome this challenge, this work integrated electrochemical sensor arrays into a digital microfluidic device to combine their distinct merits, so that soluble PD-L1 (sPD-L1) molecules can be rapidly detected in a programmed and automated manner. This new platform featured microscale electrochemical sensor arrays modified with electrically conductive 3D matrix, and can detect as low as 1 pg/mL sPD-L1 with high specificity. The sensors also have desired repeatability and can obtain reproducible results on different days. To demonstrate the functionality of the device to process more complex biofluids, we used the device to detect sPD-L1 molecules secreted by human breast cancer cell line in culture media directly and observed 2X increase in signal compared with control experiment. This novel platform holds promise for the close monitoring of sPD-L1 level in human physiological fluids to evaluate the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.