ArticleAME case reports2024
A rare case report of mucinous adenocarcinoma exacerbated by long-standing solitary rectal ulcer syndrome.
Article in AME case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS) is a rare chronic rectal lesion with potential for malignant transformation, although cases of rapid progression to mucinous adenocarcinoma are infrequent. This case report highlights such an instance in a 29-year-old male patient, emphasizing the importance of vigilance among clinicians for detecting canceration in SRUS patients. Case Description: The patient presented with recurrent constipation and anal discomfort, initially diagnosed with SRUS based on colonoscopy and pathological examination. Despite long-term mesalazine treatment, symptoms persisted, and subsequent evaluation revealed the development of mucinous adenocarcinoma within a short period. Surgical resection, combined with adjuvant FOLFOX chemotherapy, effectively controlled cancer progression. Immunohistochemical analysis showed positive expression of MLH1(+), MSH2(+), MSH6(+), PMS2(+), and HER2(+), providing molecular insights into SRUS-associated mucinous adenocarcinoma. Conclusions: This case underscores the need for increased awareness among clinicians regarding the potential for cancerous transformation in SRUS patients. Early detection and intervention are crucial for improving outcomes in SRUS-associated malignancies. Furthermore, this case adds to existing literature by presenting a rare instance of SRUS progressing rapidly to mucinous adenocarcinoma, highlighting the significance of regular monitoring and timely intervention in such cases. Further research is warranted to elucidate underlying mechanisms and risk factors, guiding future clinical practice and treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.