ArticleAME case reports2024
Well-differentiated liposarcoma of spermatic cord presenting as recurrent inguinal hernia: a case report.
Article in AME case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Well-differentiated liposarcoma arising from the paratesticular region is rare, with only a few hundred cases reported in the literature. Due to their unexpected location, these tumors are often confused for common pathologies found in the groin, including inguinal hernia, seroma, or lymphoma. Standardized diagnostic and treatment pathways have not been established for patients with paratesticular liposarcoma, thereby elevating the importance of sharing our experience. Case Description: This case describes the presentation of a 65-year-old man with a well-differentiated liposarcoma of the spermatic cord. Diagnosis was made after he underwent open herniorrhaphy to repair what was presumed to be a recurrent left inguinal hernia. Although a recommendation for formal oncologic resection and orchiectomy was made, the patient elected to proceed with watchful waiting and remains well up to last known contact. Conclusions: Paratesticular liposarcoma remains a rare clinical entity. While a few hundred cases have been reported in the literature, only a handful describe its presentation masked as an early recurrence of a groin hernia. Wide local resection along with orchiectomy and potential radiation therapy have been the mainstay of treatment. Clinicians should maintain a healthy level of suspicion for this uncommon pathology, especially in cases where patients present with early recurrence of an inguinal hernia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.