Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39091510›Full record

ArticleJAMIA open2024

The challenges and opportunities of continuous data quality improvement for healthcare administration data.

Yili Zhang, Jennifer A Callaghan-Koru, Güneş Koru

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMIA open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yili ZhangInnovation Center for Biomedical Informatics, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20007, United States.
Jennifer A Callaghan-KoruDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Fayetteville, AR 72703, United States.
Güneş KoruDepartments of Health Policy and Management & Biomedical Informatics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Fayetteville, AR 72703, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1693-4986

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Various data quality issues have prevented healthcare administration data from being fully utilized when dealing with problems ranging from COVID-19 contact tracing to controlling healthcare costs. Objectives: (i) Describe the currently adopted approaches and practices for understanding and improving the quality of healthcare administration data. (ii) Explore the challenges and opportunities to achieve continuous quality improvement for such data. Materials and Methods: We used a qualitative approach to obtain rich contextual data through semi-structured interviews conducted at a state health agency regarding Medicaid claims and reimbursement data. We interviewed all data stewards knowledgeable about the data quality issues experienced at the agency. The qualitative data were analyzed using the Framework method. Results: Sixteen themes emerged from our analysis, collected under 4 categories: (i) Defect characteristics: Data defects showed variability, frequently remained obscure, and led to negative outcomes. Detecting and resolving them was often difficult, and the work required often exceeded the organizational boundaries. (ii) Current process and people issues: The agency adopted primarily ad-hoc, manual approaches to resolving data quality problems leading to work frustration. (iii) Challenges: Communication and lack of knowledge about legacy software systems and the data maintained in them constituted challenges, followed by different standards used by various organizations and vendors, and data verification difficulties. (iv) Opportunities: Training, tool support, and standardization of data definitions emerged as immediate opportunities to improve data quality. Conclusions: Our results can be useful to similar agencies on their journey toward becoming learning health organizations leveraging data assets effectively and efficiently.

Indexed as

data governancedata qualitydata quality improvementhealthcare administrationMedicaid Management Information Systemqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID39091510
PMCPMC11293638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.