ArticleFrontiers in immunology2024
Efficacy and safety of stem cell mobilization with etoposide +cytarabine plus G-CSF in poor mobilizers with relapsed or refractory lymphoma.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Superiority of high-dose cytarabine-based mobilisation over cyclophosphamide or plerixafor in primary CNS lymphoma.Annals of hematology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is a potentially curative strategy for relapse or refractory(r/r) aggressive lymphoma. However, a proportion of lymphoma patients who are at high risk of mobilization failure fail to mobilize stem cells and cannot proceed to ASCT. The aim of this study is to explore the efficacy and safety of Etoposide combined with Cytarabine (EA) plus G-CSF mobilization in poor mobilizers (PMs) with r/r aggressive lymphoma. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed the outcomes of chemo-mobilization based on EA (Etoposide 0.1 g/m2, qd d1~3; AraC 0.5 g/m2, q12h d1~3) in 98 patients with r/r aggressive lymphoma. Of these, 39 patients met the criteria for predicted PMs as proposed by the Gruppo Italiano Trapianto di Midollo Osseo working group. Results: Of the 39 PMs, 38(97.4%) patents harvested adequate mobilization (≥2×10 Conclusion: Our findings indicate that EA plus G-CSF is an effective and tolerable CD34+ stem cell mobilization strategy for patients with r/r lymphoma, including those predicted to be PMs. This regimen could be an option for patients with r/r lymphoma, particularly those undergoing mobilization for salvage ASCT therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.