Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39091334›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2024

Direct and indirect cumulative effects of temperature, nutrients, and light on phytoplankton growth.

Anna Lena Heinrichs, Onja Johannes Hardorp, Helmut Hillebrand, Toni Schott, Maren Striebel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anna Lena HeinrichsInstitute for Chemistry and Biology of the Marine Environment (ICBM) Carl-von-Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, School of Mathematics and Science Oldenburg Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9691-4121
Onja Johannes HardorpInstitute for Chemistry and Biology of the Marine Environment (ICBM) Carl-von-Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, School of Mathematics and Science Oldenburg Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2021-4442
Helmut HillebrandInstitute for Chemistry and Biology of the Marine Environment (ICBM) Carl-von-Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, School of Mathematics and Science Oldenburg Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7449-1613
Toni SchottInstitute for Chemistry and Biology of the Marine Environment (ICBM) Carl-von-Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, School of Mathematics and Science Oldenburg Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-4636-9175
Maren StriebelInstitute for Chemistry and Biology of the Marine Environment (ICBM) Carl-von-Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, School of Mathematics and Science Oldenburg Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2061-2154

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Temperature and resource availability are pivotal factors influencing phytoplankton community structures. Numerous prior studies demonstrated their significant influence on phytoplankton stoichiometry, cell size, and growth rates. The growth rate, serving as a reflection of an organism's success within its environment, is linked to stoichiometry and cell size. Consequently, alterations in abiotic conditions affecting cell size or stoichiometry also exert indirect effects on growth. However, such results have their limitations, as most studies used a limited number of factors and factor levels which gives us limited insights into how phytoplankton respond to environmental conditions, directly and indirectly. Here, we tested for the generality of patterns found in other studies, using a combined multiple-factor gradient design and two single species with different size characteristics. We used a structural equation model (SEM) that allowed us to investigate the direct cumulative effects of temperature and resource availability (i.e., light, N and P) on phytoplankton growth, as well as their indirect effects on growth through changes in cell size and cell stoichiometry. Our results mostly support the results reported in previous research thus some effects can be identified as dominant effects. We identified rising temperature as the dominant driver for cell size reduction and increase in growth, and nutrient availability (i.e., N and P) as dominant factor for changes in cellular stoichiometry. However, indirect effects of temperature and resources (i.e., light and nutrients) on species' growth rates through cell size and cell stoichiometry differed across the two species suggesting different strategies to acclimate to its environment.

Indexed as

cell sizecell stoichiometrydirect effectsgradient designgrowthindirect effects

Identifiers

PMID39091334
PMCPMC11289788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.