Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39091323›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in hematology2024

Patients' perspectives on oral decitabine/cedazuridine for the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms.

Amer M Zeidan, Kate Perepezko, Tehseen Salimi, Terri Washington, Robert S Epstein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in hematology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Amer M ZeidanYale University and Yale Cancer Center, 333 Cedar Street, PO Box 208028, New Haven, CT 06520-8028, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7017-8160
Kate PerepezkoCorEvitas, LLC, Waltham, MA, USA.
Tehseen SalimiTaiho Oncology, Inc., Princeton, NJ, USA.
Terri WashingtonTaiho Oncology, Inc., Princeton, NJ, USA.
Robert S EpsteinEpstein Health, LLC, Woodcliff Lake, NJ, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Hypomethylating agents (HMAs) are guideline-recommended treatment for higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDS). However, Objectives: This study evaluated the perspectives of US patients with MDS receiving oral decitabine/cedazuridine (DEC-C), an alternative to IV/SC HMAs. Methods: An online survey was conducted among adult patients with MDS in the United States (10 November 2022 to 5 December 2022) who had filled a prescription for oral DEC-C between 2021 and 2022. Results: A total of 150 patients completed the survey; 61% were aged ⩾60 years and 63% were male. Of these, 123 (82%) were still receiving oral DEC-C, and 27 (18%) had stopped oral DEC-C treatment. Half (50%) of patients had received oral DEC-C for ⩾6 months. The majority reported that treatment was convenient (83%) and that they were satisfied with treatment (86%). Most patients also reported very little/no interference with regular daily activities (82%), social activities (78%), and productivity (78%). When queried about negative impacts on quality of life (QOL), treatment side effects were the most commonly reported (30% of respondents). Among patients who had previously received IV/SC HMAs ( Conclusion: Survey results suggest very little/no impact on regular daily activities and improved QOL with oral DEC-C relative to IV/SC HMAs, highlighting the potential for oral DEC-C to reduce the treatment burden associated with parenteral HMA therapy.

Indexed as

hypomethylating agentsmyelodysplastic syndromesoral decitabine and cedazuridinepatient perspectivesquality-of-life

Identifiers

PMID39091323
PMCPMC11292726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.