Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39091238›Full record

ReviewBiomolecules & therapeutics2024

Decellularized Matrices for the Treatment of Tissue Defects: from Matrix Origin to Immunological Mechanisms.

Xinyue Wang, Jiqiang Guo, Qing Yu, Luyao Zhao, Xiang Gao, Li Wang, Meiling Wen, Junrong Yan, Meiwen An, Yang Liu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomolecules & therapeutics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Xinyue WangInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, College of Biomedical Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Shanxi 030024, China.
Jiqiang GuoInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, College of Biomedical Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Shanxi 030024, China.
Qing YuInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, College of Biomedical Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Shanxi 030024, China.
Luyao ZhaoInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, College of Biomedical Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Shanxi 030024, China.
Xiang GaoInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, College of Biomedical Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Shanxi 030024, China.
Li WangInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, College of Biomedical Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Shanxi 030024, China.
Meiling WenInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, College of Biomedical Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Shanxi 030024, China.
Junrong YanShanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Tongji Shanxi Hospital, Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030032, China.
Meiwen AnInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, College of Biomedical Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Shanxi 030024, China.
Yang LiuInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, College of Biomedical Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Shanxi 030024, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Decellularized matrix transplantation has emerged as a promising therapeutic approach for repairing tissue defects, with numerous studies assessing its safety and efficacy in both animal models and clinical settings. The host immune response elicited by decellularized matrix grafts of natural biological origin plays a crucial role in determining the success of tissue repair, influenced by matrix heterogeneity and the inflammatory microenvironment of the wound. However, the specific immunologic mechanisms underlying the interaction between decellularized matrix grafts and the host immune system remain elusive. This article reviews the sources of decellularized matrices, available decellularization techniques, and residual immunogenic components. It focuses on the host immune response following decellularized matrix transplantation, with emphasis on the key mechanisms of Toll-like receptor, T-cell receptor, and TGF-β/SMAD signaling in the stages of post-transplantation immunorecognition, immunomodulation, and tissue repair, respectively. Furthermore, it highlights the innovative roles of TLR10 and miR-29a-3p in improving transplantation outcomes. An in-depth understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying the host immune response after decellularized matrix transplantation provides new directions for the repair of tissue defects.

Indexed as

Allogeneic or xenograftDecellularized matricesHost immune responseMacrophagesSignal transductionT cells

Identifiers

PMID39091238
PMCPMC11392660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.