Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39091146›Full record

ArticleCancer research and treatment2025

Trends in Cancer-Screening Rates in Korea: Findings from the National Cancer Screening Survey, 2004-2023.

EunKyo Kang, Kui Son Choi, Jae Kwan Jun, Yeol Kim, Hyeon Ji Lee, Chang Kyun Choi, Tae Hee Kim, Sun Hwa Lee, Mina Suh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer research and treatment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Racial/ethnic and geographic differences in second primary cancers in stomach cancer survivors: a comparative study of U.S. and South Korea.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Current Status of the National Cancer Screening Program in Korea: History, Achievements, and Future Directions.Journal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

EunKyo KangNational Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Kui Son ChoiNational Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Jae Kwan JunNational Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Yeol KimNational Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Hyeon Ji LeeNational Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Chang Kyun ChoiNational Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Tae Hee KimNational Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Sun Hwa LeeNational Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Mina SuhNational Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.

Funding

National Cancer Center 2210773-3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to report the overall national trends in the rates of cancer screening based on recommendations and provide insights into the changing trends of these rates across different demographics. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis study used data from the Korean National Cancer Screening Survey (KNCSS), which surveys nationwide cancer-screening rates and includes 4,500 individuals meeting the Korean National Cancer Screening Program (NCSP) protocol age criteria. Cancer-screening rates were assessed using structured questionnaires; yearly trends were analyzed for both lifetime cancer-screening rates and rates of screening based on recommendations, and subgroup analyses were performed based on age and sex.

resultsThe rates of cancer screening based on recommendations showed significant increments: the stomach cancer-screening rate increased from 39.2% in 2004 to 77.5% in 2023 (3.50% per year), the liver cancer-screening rate increased from 20.0% to 48.8% (4.30% per year), and the colorectal cancer, increased from 19.9% to 70.7% (5.15% per year). The breast cancer-screening rate increased from 33.2% to 72.7% (2.88% per year), and the cervical cancer, increased from 58.3% to 70.2% (1.08% per year). Despite some differences, particularly in relation to sociodemographic factors, screening rates increased significantly for all cancer types.

conclusionCancer-screening rates in Korea increased consistently from 2004 to 2023, demonstrating the effectiveness of the national cancer-screening program. However, the increments in breast, cervical and lung cancer-screening rates were relatively lower, indicating the need for additional efforts and strategies.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerNeoplasmsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedRepublic of KoreaSurveys and QuestionnairesColorectal neoplasmsEarly detection of cancerHealth care surveysLiver neoplasmsMass screeningStomach neoplasmsTrends

Identifiers

PMID39091146
PMCPMC11729312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.