ArticleJournal of cosmetic dermatology2024
AI assistance in aesthetic medicine-A consensus on objective medical standards.
Article in Journal of cosmetic dermatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Technological Integration in Aesthetic Practice: A Systematic Review of Artificial Intelligence, Augmented Reality and Robotics in Cosmetic Procedures.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Assessment of Methods and Attributes Used to Characterize Skin Quality: A Systematic Literature Review.Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.] · 2026Pooled it
- Evolution of Facial Assessment in Aesthetic Medicine: 3D Imaging, Digital Analysis, and Patient-Reported Outcomes.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Review
- Validation of a Machine Learning-Derived Algorithm for the Measurement of Facial First Impressions.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Article
- AI-Based Quantitative and Objective Analysis of Aesthetic Results in Genioplasty.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Article
- [Artificial intelligence-based holistic, individualized facial analysis in aesthetic medicine].Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence versus Human Assessment in the Treatment of Upper Facial Wrinkles with Abobotulinum Toxin A.Dermatology practical & conceptual · 2026Article
- Accuracy, readability, and bias of GPT-4o mini responses to oculoplastic patient questions.Frontiers in ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence Beauty Filters and Aesthetic Surgery: Insights from TikTok's Bold Glamour Filter.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025Article
- Transforming Skin Quality Evaluation With AI: From Subjective Grading to Data-Driven Precision.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Aesthetic Medicine: Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2025Review
- Hierarchical attention transformer provides assistant suggestions for orbital rejuvenation surgery.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Beyond the Algorithm: A Perspective on Tackling Bias and Cultural Sensitivity in AI-Guided Aesthetic Standards for Cosmetic Surgery in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) Region.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2025Article
- AI assistance in aesthetic medicine-A consensus on objective medical standards.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAesthetic medicine has traditionally relied on clinical scales for the objective assessment of baseline appearance and treatment outcomes. However, the scales focus on limited aesthetic areas mostly and subjective interpretation inherent in these scales can lead to variability, which undermines standardization efforts.
objectiveThe consensus meeting aimed to establish guidelines for AI application in aesthetic medicine. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn February 2024, the AI Consensus Group, comprising international experts in various specialties, convened to deliberate on AI in aesthetic medicine. The methodology included a pre-consensus survey and an iterative consensus process during the meeting.
resultsAI's implementation in Aesthetic Medicine has achieved full consensus for enhancing patient assessment and consultation, ensuring standardized care. AI's role in preventing overcorrection is recognized, alongside the need for validated objective facial assessments. Emphasis is placed on comprehensive facial aesthetic evaluations using indices such as the Facial Aesthetic Index (FAI), Facial Youth Index (FYI), and Skin Quality Index (SQI). These evaluations are to be gender-specific and exclude makeup-covered skin at baseline. Age and gender, as well as patients' ancestral roots, are to be considered integral to the AI assessment process, underlining the move towards personalized, precise treatments.
conclusionThe consensus meeting established that AI will significantly improve aesthetic medicine by standardizing patient assessments and consultations, with a strong endorsement for preventing overcorrection and advocating for validated, objective facial assessments. Utilizing indices such as the FAI, FYI, and SQI allows for gender-specific, age adjusted evaluations and insists on a makeup-free baseline for accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.