ArticleAnnals of clinical and translational neurology2024
The impact of diagnosis delay on European patients with generalised myasthenia gravis.
Article in Annals of clinical and translational neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Myasthenia Gravis With Acetylcholine Receptor Antibodies in the Very Old: Treatment Challenges and Diagnostic Pitfalls.European journal of neurology · 2026Pooled it
- Disease changes and cost analysis of myasthenia gravis: a 10 years retrospective study from a reference center in Italy.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026Article
- Assessing the Value Contribution of VyvgartAdvances in therapy · 2026Article
- A Delphi consensus on integrating novel therapies into the management of generalized myasthenia gravis.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2026Article
- Article
- Myasthenia gravis in Latin America and the Caribbean: epidemiology, resources, and accessibility to diagnosis and treatment.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Robotic Extended Thymectomy in Late-Onset Myasthenia Gravis: A 21-Year Retrospective Cohort Study of 172 Patients.European journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Article
- Differences Between Females and Males in the Diagnostic Delay and Clinical Course of Thymectomised Myasthenia Gravis.European journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Serum fibrinogen is not elevated in patients with myasthenia gravis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The burden of disease in seronegative myasthenia gravis: a patient-centered perspective.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Observational
- Epidemiology, management and patient needs in myasthenia gravis: an Italian multistakeholder consensus based on Delphi methodology.BMJ open · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe objective was to determine the mean duration of diagnosis delay for patients with myasthenia gravis from five European countries and explore the impact of >1 year diagnosis delay.
methodsPatients with myasthenia gravis (N = 387) from Europe (France/Germany/Italy/Spain/United Kingdom) and their physicians participated in the Adelphi Real World Myasthenia Gravis Disease Specific Programme™. Diagnosis delay (time from symptom onset to diagnosis) was calculated and characteristics described for patients experiencing >1 year and ≤1 year diagnosis delay. Denominators varied according to outcome as missing data were not imputed.
resultsMean (standard deviation) diagnosis delay was 363.1 (520.9) days, and 27.1% (105 out of 387) of patients experienced diagnosis delay >1 year. Among patients with >1 year and ≤1 year diagnosis delay, respectively, 69.2% (72 out of 104) and 17.4% [45 out of 259] had initially received a different diagnosis (physician-reported); 40.0% (42 out of 105) and 24.1% (68 out of 282) were Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America class III at the time of the survey (physician-reported); 72.4% (76 out of 105) and 61.3% (173 out of 282) had fatigue (subjective physician reporting from a pre-selected list of symptoms); 30.5% (32 out of 105) and 17.4% (49 out of 282) had anxiety and 21.9% (23 out of 105) and 13.1% (37 out of 282) had depression (both subjective physician reporting from a pre-selected list, Likert-style); and mean (standard deviation) MG-QoL-15r score was 14.4 (5.50) and 12.6 (7.84) (self-reported by N = 43 and N = 74 patients, respectively).
interpretationMore than a quarter of patients with myasthenia gravis experienced diagnosis delay of >1 year. These patients had a different clinical profile with regards to severity, symptoms, comorbidities and MG-QoL-15r score, compared with patients experiencing ≤1 year diagnosis delay.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.