Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39090840›Full record

ArticleAnnals of clinical and translational neurology2024

The impact of diagnosis delay on European patients with generalised myasthenia gravis.

Elena Cortés-Vicente, Andras J Borsi, Charlotte Gary, Wim G J Noel, Jennifer M S Lee, Wisam Karmous, Qiaoyi Zhang, Kavita H Gandhi, Alberto E Batista, Jonathan J DeCourcy and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of clinical and translational neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Disease changes and cost analysis of myasthenia gravis: a 10 years retrospective study from a reference center in Italy.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Elena Cortés-VicenteNeuromuscular Diseases Unit, Department of Neurology, Hospital de la Santa Creu I Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1428-1072
Andras J BorsiEMEA Market Access, Janssen-Cilag, High Wycombe, UK.
Charlotte GaryEMEA Market Affairs, Janssen-Cilag, Issy-les-Moulineaux, France.
Wim G J NoelEMEA Market Affairs, Janssen Pharmaceutica NV, Beerse, Belgium.
Jennifer M S LeeEMEA Market Access, Janssen-Cilag A/S, Birkerød, Denmark.
Wisam KarmousEMEA Market Access, Janssen-Cilag, Issy-les-Moulineaux, France.
Qiaoyi ZhangGlobal Market Access, Janssen Global Services, Titusville, New Jersey, USA.
Kavita H GandhiGlobal Market Access, Janssen Global Services, Titusville, New Jersey, USA.
Alberto E BatistaGlobal Market Access, Janssen Global Services, Titusville, New Jersey, USA.
Jonathan J DeCourcyRare Diseases, Adelphi Real World, Bollington, UK.
Sophie G BarlowStatistics and Data Analytics, Adelphi Real World, Bollington, UK.
Shiva L BirijaRare Diseases, Adelphi Real World, Bollington, UK.
Gregor A GibsonRare Diseases, Adelphi Real World, Bollington, UK.

Funding

Janssen-Cilag EMEA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective was to determine the mean duration of diagnosis delay for patients with myasthenia gravis from five European countries and explore the impact of >1 year diagnosis delay.

methodsPatients with myasthenia gravis (N = 387) from Europe (France/Germany/Italy/Spain/United Kingdom) and their physicians participated in the Adelphi Real World Myasthenia Gravis Disease Specific Programme™. Diagnosis delay (time from symptom onset to diagnosis) was calculated and characteristics described for patients experiencing >1 year and ≤1 year diagnosis delay. Denominators varied according to outcome as missing data were not imputed.

resultsMean (standard deviation) diagnosis delay was 363.1 (520.9) days, and 27.1% (105 out of 387) of patients experienced diagnosis delay >1 year. Among patients with >1 year and ≤1 year diagnosis delay, respectively, 69.2% (72 out of 104) and 17.4% [45 out of 259] had initially received a different diagnosis (physician-reported); 40.0% (42 out of 105) and 24.1% (68 out of 282) were Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America class III at the time of the survey (physician-reported); 72.4% (76 out of 105) and 61.3% (173 out of 282) had fatigue (subjective physician reporting from a pre-selected list of symptoms); 30.5% (32 out of 105) and 17.4% (49 out of 282) had anxiety and 21.9% (23 out of 105) and 13.1% (37 out of 282) had depression (both subjective physician reporting from a pre-selected list, Likert-style); and mean (standard deviation) MG-QoL-15r score was 14.4 (5.50) and 12.6 (7.84) (self-reported by N = 43 and N = 74 patients, respectively).

interpretationMore than a quarter of patients with myasthenia gravis experienced diagnosis delay of >1 year. These patients had a different clinical profile with regards to severity, symptoms, comorbidities and MG-QoL-15r score, compared with patients experiencing ≤1 year diagnosis delay.

Indexed as

Delayed DiagnosisMyasthenia GravisAdultAgedEuropeFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID39090840
PMCPMC11537147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.