Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39090795›Full record

ArticlePsychophysiology2024

Nothing to lose? Neural correlates of decision, anticipation, and feedback in the balloon analog risk task.

Stephanie N L Schmidt, Sarah Sehrig, Alexander Wolber, Brigitte Rockstroh, Daniela Mier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychophysiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Stephanie N L SchmidtDepartment of Psychology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1579-5881
Sarah SehrigDepartment of Psychology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.
Alexander WolberDepartment of Psychology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.
Brigitte RockstrohDepartment of Psychology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.
Daniela MierDepartment of Psychology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2518-7492

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft GZ: MI 1975/7-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the subprocesses of risky decision making is a prerequisite for understanding (dys-)functional decisions. For the present fMRI study, we designed a novel variant of the balloon-analog-risk task (BART) that measures three phases: decision making, reward anticipation, and feedback processing. Twenty-nine healthy young adults completed the BART. We analyzed neural activity and functional connectivity. Parametric modulation allowed assessing changes in brain functioning depending on the riskiness of the decision. Our results confirm involvement of nucleus accumbens, insula, anterior cingulate cortex, and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in all subprocesses of risky decision-making. In addition, subprocesses were differentiated by the strength of activation in these regions, as well as by changes in activity and nucleus accumbens-connectivity by the riskiness of the decision. The presented fMRI-BART variant allows distinguishing activity and connectivity during the subprocesses of risky decision making and shows how activation and connectivity patterns relate to the riskiness of the decision. Hence, it is a useful tool for unraveling impairments in subprocesses of risky decision making in people with high risk behavior.

Indexed as

Anticipation, PsychologicalDecision MakingMagnetic Resonance ImagingRewardRisk-TakingAdultBrainBrain MappingCerebral CortexFeedback, PsychologicalFemaleGyrus CinguliHumansMaleNucleus AccumbensYoung AdultBARTfMRIprobabilisticrisky decision makingventral striatum

Identifiers

PMID39090795
PMCPMC11579233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.