Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39090756›Full record

ArticleJournal of cheminformatics2024

Implementation of a soft grading system for chemistry in a Moodle plugin: reaction handling.

Louis Plyer, Gilles Marcou, Céline Perves, Fanny Bonachera, Alexander Varnek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cheminformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Louis PlyerFaculté de Chimie, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-9139-8822
Gilles MarcouLaboratory of Chemoinformatics-UMR7140, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France. g.marcou@unistra.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1676-6708
Céline PervesDirection du Numérique (DNUM), University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Fanny BonacheraLaboratory of Chemoinformatics-UMR7140, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0908-6261
Alexander VarnekLaboratory of Chemoinformatics-UMR7140, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1886-925X

Funding

IdEx Formation 2022, Strasbourg, France ref project 33
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Here, we present a new method for evaluating questions on chemical reactions in the context of remote education. This method can be used when binary grading is not sufficient as some tolerance may be acceptable. In order to determine a grade, the developed workflow uses the pairwise similarity assessment of two considered reactions, each encoded by a single molecular graph with the help of the Condensed Graph of Reaction (CGR) approach. This workflow is part of the ChemMoodle project and is implemented as a Moodle Plugin. It uses the Chemdoodle engine for reaction drawing and visualization and communicates with a REST server calculating the similarity score using ISIDA fragment descriptors. The plugin is open-source, accessible in GitHub ( https://github.com/Laboratoire-de-Chemoinformatique/moodle-qtype_reacsimilarity ) and on the Moodle plugin store ( https://moodle.org/plugins/qtype_reacsimilarity?lang=en ). Both similarity measures and fragmentation can be configured.Scientific contribution This work introduces an open-source method for evaluating chemical reaction questions within Moodle using the CGR approach. Our contribution provides a nuanced grading mechanism that accommodates acceptable tolerances in reaction assessments, enhancing the accuracy and flexibility of the grading process.

Indexed as

Chemical reactionsEducational chemistryMoodlePluginSoftgrading

Identifiers

PMID39090756
PMCPMC11295431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.