Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39090739›Full record

ReviewClinical and translational medicine2024

Artificial intelligence in fusion protein three-dimensional structure prediction: Review and perspective.

Himansu Kumar, Pora Kim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical and translational medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. AlphaFold3: An Overview of Applications and Performance Insights.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Himansu KumarDepartment of Bioinformatics and Systems Medicine, McWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
Pora KimDepartment of Bioinformatics and Systems Medicine, McWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8321-6864

Funding

Functional annotation of new genes aided by deep learningR35GM138184 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI KIM, PORA · 2020 to 2024
$1.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM138184NIH HHS R35GM138184University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) have accelerated the prediction of unknown protein structures. However, accurately predicting the three-dimensional (3D) structures of fusion proteins remains a difficult task because the current AI-based protein structure predictions are focused on the WT proteins rather than on the newly fused proteins in nature. Following the central dogma of biology, fusion proteins are translated from fusion transcripts, which are made by transcribing the fusion genes between two different loci through the chromosomal rearrangements in cancer. Accurately predicting the 3D structures of fusion proteins is important for understanding the functional roles and mechanisms of action of new chimeric proteins. However, predicting their 3D structure using a template-based model is challenging because known template structures are often unavailable in databases. Deep learning (DL) models that utilize multi-level protein information have revolutionized the prediction of protein 3D structures. In this review paper, we highlighted the latest advancements and ongoing challenges in predicting the 3D structure of fusion proteins using DL models. We aim to explore both the advantages and challenges of employing AlphaFold2, RoseTTAFold, tr-Rosetta and D-I-TASSER for modelling the 3D structures. HIGHLIGHTS: This review provides the overall pipeline and landscape of the prediction of the 3D structure of fusion protein. This review provides the factors that should be considered in predicting the 3D structures of fusion proteins using AI approaches in each step. This review highlights the latest advancements and ongoing challenges in predicting the 3D structure of fusion proteins using deep learning models. This review explores the advantages and challenges of employing AlphaFold2, RoseTTAFold, tr-Rosetta, and D-I-TASSER to model 3D structures.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDeep LearningHumansProtein ConformationAIAlphaFold2deep learningfusion protein structureprotein structure predictionRoseTTAFold

Identifiers

PMID39090739
PMCPMC11294035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.