Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39090688›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2024

Current genomic deep learning models display decreased performance in cell type-specific accessible regions.

Pooja Kathail, Richard W Shuai, Ryan Chung, Chun Jimmie Ye, Gabriel B Loeb, Nilah M Ioannidis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pooja KathailCenter for Computational Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA. pooja.kathail@berkeley.edu.
Richard W ShuaiDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Ryan ChungCenter for Computational Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Chun Jimmie YeDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Gabriel B LoebDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA. gabriel.loeb@ucsf.edu.
Nilah M IoannidisCenter for Computational Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA. nilah@berkeley.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-9628-8229

Funding

Mapping gene-by-environment interactions using multiplexed single cell RNA-sequencingR01HG011239 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI YE, CHUN JIMMIE · 2020 to 2023
$4.1M
Statistical Methods for Personal Genome InterpretationR00HG009677 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI IOANNIDIS, NILAH MONNIER · 2019 to 2021
$634k
NHGRI NIH HHS R00 HG009677NHGRI NIH HHS R00HG009677NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG011239NHGRI NIH HHS R01HG011239
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA number of deep learning models have been developed to predict epigenetic features such as chromatin accessibility from DNA sequence. Model evaluations commonly report performance genome-wide; however, cis regulatory elements (CREs), which play critical roles in gene regulation, make up only a small fraction of the genome. Furthermore, cell type-specific CREs contain a large proportion of complex disease heritability.

resultsWe evaluate genomic deep learning models in chromatin accessibility regions with varying degrees of cell type specificity. We assess two modeling directions in the field: general purpose models trained across thousands of outputs (cell types and epigenetic marks) and models tailored to specific tissues and tasks. We find that the accuracy of genomic deep learning models, including two state-of-the-art general purpose models-Enformer and Sei-varies across the genome and is reduced in cell type-specific accessible regions. Using accessibility models trained on cell types from specific tissues, we find that increasing model capacity to learn cell type-specific regulatory syntax-through single-task learning or high capacity multi-task models-can improve performance in cell type-specific accessible regions. We also observe that improving reference sequence predictions does not consistently improve variant effect predictions, indicating that novel strategies are needed to improve performance on variants.

conclusionsOur results provide a new perspective on the performance of genomic deep learning models, showing that performance varies across the genome and is particularly reduced in cell type-specific accessible regions. We also identify strategies to maximize performance in cell type-specific accessible regions.

Indexed as

ChromatinDeep LearningGenomicsEpigenesis, GeneticHumansModels, GeneticOrgan SpecificityRegulatory Sequences, Nucleic AcidChromatinChromatin accessibilityDeep learningVariant effect prediction

Identifiers

PMID39090688
PMCPMC11293111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.