Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39090564›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2024

Dosimetric comparison of ZAP-X, Gamma Knife, and CyberKnife stereotactic radiosurgery for single brain metastasis.

Jinyuan Wang, Qingzeng Zheng, Yanping Wang, Chengcheng Wang, Shouping Xu, Zhongjian Ju, Longsheng Pan, Jingmin Bai, Yunmo Liu, Baolin Qu and 1 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jinyuan Wang *Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China.
Qingzeng Zheng *Department of Radiotherapy, Beijing Geriatric Hospital, Beijing, 100095, China.
Yanping Wang *Department of Radiation Oncology, Hebei Yizhou Cancer Hospital, Zhuozhou, 072750, China.
Chengcheng WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The First Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China.
Shouping XuNational Cancer Center, National Clincal Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Zhongjian JuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The First Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China.
Longsheng PanDepartment of Neurosurgery, the First Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China.
Jingmin BaiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The First Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China.
Yunmo LiuDepartment of Neurosurgery, the First Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China.
Baolin QuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The First Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China. qubl6212@sina.com.
Xiangkun DaiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The First Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China. iabcde@163.com.

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China 2022YFC2409501
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the dosimetric characteristics of ZAP-X stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for single brain metastasis by comparing with two mature SRS platforms.

methodsThirteen patients with single brain metastasis treated with CyberKnife (CK) G4 were selected retrospectively. The prescription dose for the planning target volume (PTV) was 18-24 Gy for 1-3 fractions. The PTV volume ranged from 0.44 to 11.52 cc.Treatment plans of thirteen patients were replanned using the ZAP-X plan system and the Gamma Knife (GK) ICON plan system with the same prescription dose and organs at risk (OARs) constraints. The prescription dose of PTV was normalized to 70% for both ZAP-X and CK, while it was 50% for GK. The dosimetric parameters of three groups included the plan characteristics (CI, GI, GSI, beams, MUs, treatment time), PTV (D

resultsThe CI of GK was significantly lower than that of ZAP-X and CK. Regarding the mean value, ZAP-X had a lower GI and higher GSI, but there was no significant difference among the three groups. The MUs of ZAP-X were significantly lower than those of CK, and the mean value of the treatment time of ZAP-X was significantly shorter than that of CK. For PTV, the D

conclusionFor the SRS treating single brain metastasis, all three treatment devices, ZAP-X system, CyberKnife G4 system, and GammaKnife system, could meet clinical treatment requirements. The newly platform ZAP-X could provide a high-quality plan equivalent to or even better than CyberKnife and Gamma Knife, with ZAP-X presenting a certain dose advantage, especially with a more conformal dose distribution and better protection for brain tissue. As the ZAP-X systems get continuous improvements and upgrades, they may become a new SRS platform for the treatment of brain metastasis.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsRadiosurgeryRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOrgans at RiskRadiometryRetrospective StudiesBrain metastasisCyberKnifeDosimetric comparisonGamma KnifeStereotactic radiosurgeryZAP-X

Identifiers

PMID39090564
PMCPMC11295608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.