Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39090514›Full record

ReviewDermatology and therapy2024

Treatment of Epidermolysis Bullosa and Future Directions: A Review.

Sorina Danescu, Mircea Negrutiu, Cristina Has

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Dermatology and therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Distinct responses ofMolecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. RiboScreenBiomedicines · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Basement membranes at a glance.Journal of cell science · 2025
    Review
  14. The Role of Fibroblasts in Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa Pathogenesis and Current Treatment Approaches.JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sorina DanescuDepartment of Dermatology, University of Medicine Iuliu Hatieganu Cluj-Napoca, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Mircea NegrutiuDepartment of Dermatology, University of Medicine Iuliu Hatieganu Cluj-Napoca, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Cristina HasDepartment of Dermatology, Medical Center University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany. cristina.has@uniklinik-freiburg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6066-507X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) comprises rare genetic disorders characterized by skin and mucosal membrane blistering induced by mechanical trauma. Molecularly, pathogenic variants affect genes encoding proteins crucial for epidermal-dermal adhesion and stability. Management of severe EB is multidisciplinary, focusing on wound healing support, ensuring that patients thrive, and complication treatment. Despite extensive research over 30 years, novel therapeutic approaches face challenges. Gene therapy and protein therapy struggle with efficacy, while regenerative cell-based therapies show limited effects. Drug repurposing to target various pathogenic mechanisms has gained attention, as has in vivo gene therapy with drugs for dystrophic and junctional EB that were recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA). However, their high cost limits global accessibility. This review examines therapeutic advancements made over the past 5 years, exploiting a systematic literature review and clinical trial data.

Indexed as

BlisteringGene therapyRepurposed drugsSkin adhesionWound healing

Identifiers

PMID39090514
PMCPMC11333680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.