ReviewOphthalmology and therapy2024
Systematic Literature Reviews Comparing the Long-Term Safety Outcomes for the Port Delivery System with Ranibizumab (PDS) Versus Other Ocular Implants.
Review in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Low Rates of Fibrosis in Eyes Treated with the Port Delivery Platform with Ranibizumab or with Monthly Ranibizumab in the Archway Trial.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo determine whether the types and rates of post-surgical complications associated with the Port Delivery System with ranibizumab (PDS) are comparable with those reported for other ocular implants that cross the sclera.
methodsSystematic literature reviews were conducted to determine the long-term (≥ 18-month) safety of ocular implants that cross the sclera in clinical trials and real-world studies. Complication types and rates were compared with those reported for the PDS in phase III clinical trials (Archway, Pagoda, and Pavilion).
resultsSixteen clinical trials (24 publications) and 43 real-world studies were identified reporting 30 complications in eyes with 15 implant types and 8 ocular diseases. Implants were associated with an acceptable, well-characterized safety profile, with most complications resolving spontaneously or with treatment. Device-related complications were reported in 0.7% (0.0-5.0%) of study eyes in clinical trials and 1.3% (0.0-14.5%) of eyes in real-world studies. Rates of conjunctival complications were 2.1% (0.0-22.8%) and 2.2% (0.9-4.6%), respectively. The overall types and rates of adverse events of special interest reported for the PDS in phase III trials (cataract, conjunctival bleb, vitreous hemorrhage, conjunctival erosion, conjunctival retraction, endophthalmitis, implant dislocation, retinal detachment, and hyphema) were within the ranges reported for other ocular implants.
conclusionsThe rates of complications reported in phase III clinical trials for the PDS were within the ranges reported for other ocular implants that cross the sclera. This suggests that the long-term safety of the PDS is consistent with other ocular devices established in ophthalmology clinical practice.
trial registrationPROSPERO international prospective register of systematic reviews: CRD5202234129, CRD42022343129.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.