ArticleGeroScience2025
From data to decisions: AI and functional connectivity for diagnosis, prognosis, and recovery prediction in stroke.
Article in GeroScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multimodal Signatures of Brain Aging: From Descriptive Analyses to Machine Learning-Based Integration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Stratification of Motor Cortex Excitability to Transcranial Stimulation Uncovers Functional Network Differences in Healthy Older Adults as Revealed by Resting State EEG Functional Coupling in Brain Network.Comprehensive Physiology · 2026Article
- Quantitative EEG analysis related to coma and prognosis in acute severe cerebral infarction.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- A nomogram model incorporating blood biomarkers predicts 3-week functional outcomes in stroke patients.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
- Towards Transforming Neurorehabilitation: The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Diagnosis and Treatment of Neurological Disorders.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Core muscle rehabilitation during early mobilization after stroke: a narrative review and clinical framework.Frontiers in neurologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stroke is a severe medical condition which may lead to permanent disability conditions. The initial 8 weeks following a stroke are crucial for rehabilitation, as most recovery occurs during this period. Personalized approaches and predictive biomarkers are needed for tailored rehabilitation. In this context, EEG brain connectivity and Artificial Intelligence (AI) can play a crucial role in diagnosing and predicting stroke outcomes efficiently. In the present study, 127 patients with subacute ischemic lesions and 90 age- and gender-matched healthy controls were enrolled. EEG recordings were obtained from each participant within 15 days of stroke onset. Clinical evaluations were performed at baseline and at 40-days follow-up using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). Functional connectivity analysis was conducted using Total Coherence (TotCoh) and Small Word (SW). Quadratic support vector machines (SVM) algorithms were implemented to classify healthy subjects compared to stroke patients (Healthy vs Stroke), determine the affected hemisphere (Left vs Right Hemisphere), and predict functional recovery (Functional Recovery Prediction). In the classification for Functional Recovery Prediction, an accuracy of 94.75%, sensitivity of 96.27% specificity of 92.33%, and AUC of 0.95 were achieved; for Healthy vs Stroke, an accuracy of 99.09%, sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 98.46%, and AUC of 0.99 were achieved. For Left vs Right Hemisphere classification, accuracy was 86.77%, sensitivity was 91.44%, specificity was 80.33%, and AUC was 0.87. These findings highlight the potential of utilizing functional connectivity measures based on EEG in combination with AI algorithms to improve patient outcomes by targeted rehabilitation interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.