ArticleEJNMMI physics2024
Dosimetric implications of kidney anatomical volume changes in
Article in EJNMMI physics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Modelling the relative precision of whole-kidney dosimetry in molecular radiotherapy using a power law approach.Radiation protection dosimetry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThis study aims to evaluate the use of CT-based whole kidney parenchyma (WKP) segmentation in
methodsSPECT/CT images of 18 patients were acquired over the abdomen approximately 4 h (h) (D0), 24 h (D1), 48 h (D2) and 168 h (D7) post-administration of
resultsWhole-kidney parenchyma (WKP) volumes, ranging from 31 to 243 mL, showed a gradual increase from baseline (mean ± SD = 130.6 ± 46.1 mL) at the initial time points D0 (138.5 ± 44.7 mL) and D1 (139.4 ± 41.6 mL), followed by a slight decrease at D2 (132.8 ± 44.5 mL) and a further decrease at D7 (129.2 ± 42.7 mL). The volume increase at D0 and D1 was statistically significant. Spleen volume did not change during treatment, suggesting that amino acid infusion rather than irradiation effects caused WKP volume changes. Bland-Altman analysis revealed WKP volume biases of 8.77% (D0 vs. B
conclusionsKidney volume exhibited significant variation form D0 to D7, affecting the precision of dosimetry calculation, primarily due to errors in whole-kidney parenchyma (WKP) delineation. Notably, using WKP segmentation from a single CT scan applied to sequential SPECT images introduce further uncertainty and may lead to an overestimation of the absorbed dose. The fluctuations in kidney volume are most likely attributable to amino acid infusion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.