ReviewInternational urogynecology journal2024
The Current Evidence and How-To on Combined Sacrocolpopexy and Rectopexy.
Review in International urogynecology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- 2025 Delphi consensus on robotic ventral mesh rectopexy.International journal of colorectal disease · 2025Guideline
- The BioSynIRS trial: biologic versus synthetic mesh for multicompartment pelvic floor reconstruction.Techniques in coloproctology · 2026Trial
- [Pelvic floor reconstruction-An interdisciplinary overview].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Laparoscopic lateral suspension (uterus preservation) and ventral mesh rectopexy for the treatment of multi-compartment pelvic organ prolapse: surgical technique.Gynecology and pelvic medicine · 2026Article
- History of the Treatment of Rectal Prolapse.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2025Review
- Influence of Transperineal Ultrasound on the POP-Q System in the Surgical Indication of Symptomatic Pelvic Organ Prolapse.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisMulticompartment prolapse is a complex pelvic floor condition that can involve coordination of both urogynecologists and colorectal surgeons.
methodsConcomitant sacrocolpopexy and ventral rectopexy is a safe and effective approach to treating this condition.
resultsThe combined procedure has high rates of patient satisfaction and symptom improvement, including defecatory dysfunction, sexual health, and overall increased quality of life.
conclusionConcomitant sacrocolpopexy with ventral rectopexy is safe and improves overall outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.