Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39090457›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology experimental2024

Reproducibility of CT-based opportunistic vertebral volumetric bone mineral density measurements from an automated segmentation framework.

Jannis Bodden, Philipp Prucker, Anjany Sekuboyina, Malek El Husseini, Katharina Grau, Sebastian Rühling, Egon Burian, Claus Zimmer, Thomas Baum, Jan S Kirschke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology experimental, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jannis Bodden *Department of Neuroradiology, TUM School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany. jannis.bodden@tum.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5997-203X
Philipp Prucker *Department of Neuroradiology, TUM School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Anjany SekuboyinaDepartment of Informatics, TUM School of Computation, Information and Technology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Malek El HusseiniDepartment of Neuroradiology, TUM School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Katharina GrauDepartment of Neuroradiology, TUM School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Sebastian RühlingDepartment of Neuroradiology, TUM School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Egon BurianDepartment of diagnostic and interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Claus ZimmerDepartment of Neuroradiology, TUM School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Thomas BaumDepartment of Neuroradiology, TUM School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Jan S KirschkeDepartment of Neuroradiology, TUM School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo investigate the reproducibility of automated volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) measurements from routine thoracoabdominal computed tomography (CT) assessed with segmentations by a convolutional neural network and automated correction of contrast phases, on diverse scanners, with scanner-specific asynchronous or scanner-agnostic calibrations.

methodsWe obtained 679 observations from 278 CT scans in 121 patients (77 males, 63.6%) studied from 04/2019 to 06/2020. Observations consisted of two vBMD measurements from Δdifferent reconstruction kernels (n = 169), Δcontrast phases (n = 133), scan Δsessions (n = 123), Δscanners (n = 63), or Δall of the aforementioned (n = 20), and observations lacking scanner-specific calibration (n = 171). Precision was assessed using root-mean-square error (RMSE) and root-mean-square coefficient of variation (RMSCV). Cross-measurement agreement was assessed using Bland-Altman plots; outliers within 95% confidence interval of the limits of agreement were reviewed.

resultsRepeated measurements from Δdifferent reconstruction kernels were highly precise (RMSE 3.0 mg/cm

conclusionAutomatic vBMD assessment from routine CT is precise across varying setups, when calibrated appropriately. Low precision was found in patients with signs of new or worsening hydropic decompensation, what should be considered an exclusion criterion for both opportunistic and dedicated quantitative CT. RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Automated CT-based vBMD measurements are precise in various scenarios, including cross-session and cross-scanner settings, and may therefore facilitate opportunistic screening for osteoporosis and surveillance of BMD in patients undergoing routine clinical CT scans. KEY POINTS: Artificial intelligence-based tools facilitate BMD measurements in routine clinical CT datasets. Automated BMD measurements are highly reproducible in various settings. Reliable, automated opportunistic osteoporosis diagnostics allow for large-scale application.

Indexed as

Bone DensityTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeural Networks, ComputerReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesArtificial intelligenceBone densityDensitometryOsteoporosisTomography (x-ray computed)

Identifiers

PMID39090457
PMCPMC11294511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.