Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39090440›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental management2024

Modelling Alternative Economic Incentive Schemes for Semi-Natural Grassland Conservation in Estonia.

Takamasa Nishizawa, Johannes Schuler, Claudia Bethwell, Michael Glemnitz, Maaria Semm, Monika Suškevičs, Laura Hämäläinen, Kalev Sepp, Rando Värnik, Sandra Uthes and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental management, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Takamasa NishizawaLeibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Müncheberg, Germany. takamasa.nishizawa@zalf.de.
Johannes SchulerLeibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Müncheberg, Germany.
Claudia BethwellLeibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Müncheberg, Germany.
Michael GlemnitzLeibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Müncheberg, Germany.
Maaria SemmEstonian University of Life Sciences, Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Chair of Environmental Protection and Landscape Management, Kreutzwaldi 5, 51006, Tartu, Estonia.
Monika SuškevičsEstonian University of Life Sciences, Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Chair of Environmental Protection and Landscape Management, Kreutzwaldi 5, 51006, Tartu, Estonia.
Laura HämäläinenEstonian University of Life Sciences, Institute of Agriculture and Environment, Chair of Rural Economics, Kreutzwaldi 1, 51006, Tartu, Estonia.
Kalev SeppEstonian University of Life Sciences, Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Chair of Environmental Protection and Landscape Management, Kreutzwaldi 5, 51006, Tartu, Estonia.
Rando VärnikEstonian University of Life Sciences, Institute of Agriculture and Environment, Chair of Rural Economics, Kreutzwaldi 1, 51006, Tartu, Estonia.
Sandra UthesLeibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Müncheberg, Germany.
Joachim AurbacherJustus-Liebig-University Giessen, Institute of Farm and Agribusiness Management, Giessen, Germany.
Peter ZanderLeibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Müncheberg, Germany.

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 01LC1809AEesti Teadusagentuur 4-8/19/10
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Semi-natural grasslands (SNGLs) in Estonia are threatened by abandonment. This threat is leading to concerns about the degradation of biodiversity within grassland communities. Despite the high relevance of economic incentives in this context, how such incentives influence land managers' decision-making regarding the agricultural use of SNGLs has not been investigated. To obtain its socio-ecological implications for policy-making, we developed regionally specific agricultural scenarios (compensation payments, livestock capacity, hey export, and bioenergy production) and an interdisciplinary modelling approach that made it possible to simulate agricultural land use changes through land managers' responses to varied economic conditions. Through this approach, we found that some economic factors hampered the use of SNGLs: the moderate profitability of beef production, labour shortages, and the relatively high profitability of mulching. We observed a positive relationship between SNGLs and habitat suitability for breeding and feeding birds. However, due to the high maintenance costs of SNGLs, the modelling results indicated that increasing the use of SNGLs through public budgets caused crowding-out effects, i.e., the deteriorating market integration of regional agriculture. This study emphasises the need for policy measures aimed at cost-effective, labour-efficient management practices for SNGLs.

Indexed as

AgricultureConservation of Natural ResourcesGrasslandAnimalsBiodiversityEstoniaModels, EconomicAbandonmentEconomic viabilityHabitat qualityIntegrated land-use modellingSemi-natural grasslandsSustainable rural development

Identifiers

PMID39090440
PMCPMC11393159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.