Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39090391›Full record

ArticleNature microbiology2024

An acidophilic fungus promotes prey digestion in a carnivorous plant.

Pei-Feng Sun, Min R Lu, Yu-Ching Liu, Brandon J P Shaw, Chieh-Ping Lin, Hung-Wei Chen, Yu-Fei Lin, Daphne Z Hoh, Huei-Mien Ke, I-Fan Wang and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A year of microbiology.Nature microbiology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Pei-Feng SunBiodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1927-1914
Min R LuBiodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1910-6991
Yu-Ching LiuBiodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7747-4376
Brandon J P ShawGeography and Environment, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-3787-6227
Chieh-Ping LinBiodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-4210-1063
Hung-Wei ChenBiodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6789-6011
Yu-Fei LinBiodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1031-3484
Daphne Z HohBiodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7810-1034
Huei-Mien KeDepartment of Microbiology, Soochow University, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5527-0815
I-Fan WangDepartment of Biotechnology and Bioindustry Sciences, College of Bioscience and Biotechnology, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-4302-8005
Mei-Yeh Jade LuBiodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4053-4889
Erica B YoungDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0068-5938
Jonathan MillettGeography and Environment, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4701-3071
Roland KirschnerSchool of Forestry and Resource Conservation, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4956-5662
Ying-Chung Jimmy LinDepartment of Life Science, College of Life Science, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7120-4690
Ying-Lan ChenDepartment of Biotechnology and Bioindustry Sciences, College of Bioscience and Biotechnology, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3145-7882
Isheng Jason TsaiBiodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan. ijtsai@gate.sinica.edu.tw.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2123-5058

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Leaves of the carnivorous sundew plants (Drosera spp.) secrete mucilage that hosts microorganisms, but whether this microbiota contributes to prey digestion is unclear. We identified the acidophilic fungus Acrodontium crateriforme as the dominant species in the mucilage microbial communities, thriving in multiple sundew species across the global range. The fungus grows and sporulates on sundew glands as its preferred acidic environment, and its presence in traps increased the prey digestion process. A. crateriforme has a reduced genome similar to other symbiotic fungi. During A. crateriforme-Drosera spatulata coexistence and digestion of prey insects, transcriptomes revealed significant gene co-option in both partners. Holobiont expression patterns during prey digestion further revealed synergistic effects in several gene families including fungal aspartic and sedolisin peptidases, facilitating prey digestion in leaves, as well as nutrient assimilation and jasmonate signalling pathway expression. This study establishes that botanical carnivory is defined by adaptations involving microbial partners and interspecies interactions.

Indexed as

DroseraPlant LeavesSymbiosisAnimalsCarnivorous PlantCarnivoryCyclopentanesFungiInsectaOxylipinsTranscriptomeCyclopentanesjasmonic acidOxylipins

Identifiers

PMID39090391
PMCPMC11445062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.